Re: [Uta] Comments on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-03

Daniel Margolis <dmargolis@google.com> Wed, 01 March 2017 11:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dmargolis@google.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA08A129998 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 03:47:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Og_1ueh7rPbD for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 03:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09C58129508 for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 03:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id s15so6492954ywg.0 for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 03:47:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FRa6fN9uc8baLf77zit4f43gfWdkbcA6PoRQKxLuhGo=; b=CpxK6ubYjYeRwHNLLEHjdZYp5HRWHQUNeUbXcK0bwgDDeVzz53anjctMXV0Tipr7ph V3gT3eisxO1jiGsIqoPgSC8mtcw1tWvThvaAx9vnZYAzsCoy1Wom6cHnDkmk114wepmS GfISy7m+USaQpJu7zi7CBybTuOlKH2ncq+/MAHzwBCZ70KPIeWozebdSa7ZZv3Io1OzI I6+ZiaUhYR1FZT/EVNLqNM2UT6sPTWwsQW/PThRb0xHcfV4Ce/+xwWZHOpOOUO2J1SmX 1kw5t4nyyqn9pGhrg/qf5LbXEWc21Adxd4iYxsPu+WhFp63sL8+Itsu8gf4ip6XlwXIk X13A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FRa6fN9uc8baLf77zit4f43gfWdkbcA6PoRQKxLuhGo=; b=JZkwPRVfOUOdeMP1k/sloGgESJnQtnoSBb17i/F1ael9+pnjcmrO+NEAQS6p99blp1 al3kgXPAes7KvuF1EdnHE09U0Dx/D9UvVAmytnPja7RCf5EIMg7nw9HTx7IvBa2XnQGa 15kBgYYoy10TqXBNOXvgav1m48+c8XQzLVCz3d7FhawHYcYaCLlao5cMbJWkTTphjkwB dshnEfTllCfATrq7djnH6DYZzUavFUvuBWjCd+e3CFSbpRW1Yv3j5QnW6NvrRduZ7Ebx 6GZjEaoARTmK1i7B3QgfPy8iM7ooaETgRKvGY51xT9tEk3rYHVDHwkzSD0VALNlqidA2 7F8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lpOZ64M1Wj35BqDc1Uz0hGHemHb8L6PHBKzYygWH+quIlem3BkFoOLfV1VvTTzBQaqtabNDbLkHmOrXXPt
X-Received: by 10.129.135.69 with SMTP id x66mr3232747ywf.279.1488368863870; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 03:47:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.24.6 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 03:47:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170301045522.1001.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <813df83a-841e-4e6a-e3a1-f2852b20ddbc@bluepopcorn.net> <20170301045522.1001.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Daniel Margolis <dmargolis@google.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:47:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CANtKdUe8z=iY_d1n=CX4hT6x-Y=-5XbOje73ZzrArBhAHfXEKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="001a114f03127619760549a9e15c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/Uf1_t_cOdLjjf_N-S2P2alsG7Ck>
Cc: uta@ietf.org, Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Comments on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-03
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:47:46 -0000

Sounds like we go back to underscore-prefixed. Thanks for the feedback
John.

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:55 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <813df83a-841e-4e6a-e3a1-f2852b20ddbc@bluepopcorn.net> you
> write:
> >3.1. MTA-STS TXT records
> >
> >There is no IANA registry for reserved hostnames, which is why protocols
> >like SPF store their policies at the domain itself.
>
> Urrgh.  SPF is as far as I know the only protocol published by the
> IETF that stores policies at the unprefixed hostname, and that is
> widely agreed to be a mistake.  DKIM and DMARC use prefixes.
>
> There's the somewhat separate issue that if the prefixed name has to
> be a hostname so it can be used in a URI, it can't contain an
> underscore.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> PS: Dave Crocker and I have been working on a prefix registry, but
> it's a thankless task.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> Uta@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
>