IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Uta Digest, Vol 28, Issue 16

Neil Cook <neil.cook@noware.co.uk> Thu, 24 March 2016 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <neil.cook@noware.co.uk>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7683F12D9EC for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vps93RDTvyYf for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.noware.co.uk (mail.noware.co.uk [192.241.243.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D6812D0A6 for <uta@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from neil-cook-mbp.home (unknown [109.149.243.142]) by mail.noware.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA3B11C6D73 for <uta@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 23:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_01D54E21-76FF-4ED3-A017-D592F9A1023E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: Neil Cook <neil.cook@noware.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20160324191631.GN6602@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 23:27:24 +0000
Message-Id: <D52B1956-519C-4A71-B0D9-E7F5010F5551@noware.co.uk>
References: <mailman.354.1458836179.3382.uta@ietf.org> <5B12C084-3EB4-4789-A12D-29B04C157AB8@dukhovni.org> <CANtKdUeYJ-qcqu4WocYMKUcs8opfD1_edti2HcNNY=Mybp1Trw@mail.gmail.com> <20160324191631.GN6602@mournblade.imrryr.org>
To: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=TdMYtHgh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OAOH1DLVsUzJwANTw+DgKQ==:117 a=OAOH1DLVsUzJwANTw+DgKQ==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10:nop_no_from_header a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10:nop_no_to_header a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10:nop_no_subject_header a=lyf1682xAAAA:8 a=MEoDHwZHUVOdEaR8TOcA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=ZGFJ0aOWL2oA:10:demote_sms_auto_template_2 a=eqb9LKVKm7YA:10:mobile_email_address_1 a=QXGwf0UU0fz7CPr6zGQA:9
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/VZ6S_GTlIghqo-YFjU-d3H624PA>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Uta Digest, Vol 28, Issue 16
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 23:27:28 -0000

> On 24 Mar 2016, at 19:16, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> 
> This sure ain't pretty!  I sure wish you guys would hurry up and
> do DANE, but wishing it won't make it so... :-(
> 

I’m also wondering why all this work on a new standard, and why not just do DANE…

Neil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email