Re: [Uta] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: (with COMMENT)

Sorry for the slow reply. I missed this one.

1. Done.
2. Done for 8.1. For 8.2, did you mean the cache-control recommendation? I
see that as purely up to the recipient, so less worthy of normative
language, but I can be swayed if you feel strongly about it.
3. Done.

These will be fixed in the latest draft.

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 7:11 AM Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:

> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Some questions on use of normative language:
>
> 1) sec 3.3.: Is there a reason that you not always use normative language
> for
> the recommendation regarding rate limiting? e.g. "...we suggest
> implementions
> may limit further attempts to a period of five minutes or longer..." or "A
> suggested timeout is one minute, and a suggested maximum policy size 64
> kilobytes". (also a nit here s/implementions/implementations/)
>
> 2) Also in sec 8.1. and 8.2 you maybe want to use normative language as
> well...?
>
> 3) And there also a few cases in section 10.2 where normative language
> could be
> appropriate/help: "we strongly recommend implementers to prefer policy
> "max_age" values to be as long as is practical." and "we suggest
> implementers
> do not wait until a cached policy has expired before checking for an
> update"
> and "MTAs should alert administrators to repeated policy refresh failures
> long
> before cached policies expire"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> Uta@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
>

Re: [Uta] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: (with COMMENT)

Attachment: smime.p7s