IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] tlsrpt

Daniel Margolis <dmargolis@google.com> Fri, 26 April 2019 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dmargolis@google.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0913120091 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 05:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5gGfLXvvnDZt for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 05:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2204120045 for <uta@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 05:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id w13so1810448vsc.4 for <uta@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 05:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vnt7n84E2HgboWujnJc5PwAAevXa/HOAfecoQCHur7E=; b=PWNRjGoGy6zgjtaUEI/WrjWWRS2oX63bBvtTWozMuaR1j3Nsc3dAfSDXahn+DToUvL JLiVZrqIcfs2Cjv1ap52ZSdD1msejYepCaW9+9dhxSfI7ShlL/pZiChkyQEpm6qTnR3W SQYosB+tN42OxAuTPLF7tWt8Oa4/peV19B0Sc7lvun//4B8QmiJFMMdOcfZ77sGmqz4C gy1qYvgCd/Q3EJlPYQz7w2fDmYDtadGfE7XirmpybydKyH/91YNlnJHjZWsE6c7ToEYc E95fORbToiwuMdpKlzG2HaUq5/0vOqdOcw6aL4nIxk2eC8PCaTfNxmvaSi6VCW2oVyTk qW8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vnt7n84E2HgboWujnJc5PwAAevXa/HOAfecoQCHur7E=; b=YgmWOKdvYg/zB/p6/DCNJRK5uLdS6gYSC1zELaWTfjeF3y82f4FUbTAZxlVxOhtuXD /7DOCf/zL14jNdi/MT2WS80CqtHb6I1NxKApqI760O2dq6wtqVSl3f9SLdh6Bk341yOb iuTMmIwPnj84dT9dklV+ucfyVgPNGLvMnlWzcije40PLCnrF2BqTqI4MZZ6emL6FY13C mDUuviGCLPzLgv1GoID/XqYcAmQnVVW5OxVSnPMLKccN5ogWt5JDJZbKRX5DRURsycYI eJ/2mHj+BO3KtqvRyOJOok2m0tuyrUvUeh+ZxVMHiJlLra98KonSOM7qPHWQWiVXBuSP N3Yw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWVjEnB0IjaJqIav8JXMNPNyLF1jCtDWhSWd3rYV8MQ/vRDqRpx 5KULVPQ9WMa73jAKA4e9BtUkHJAU54VguupbRD3sJdiT6d10QfMn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqylq3CahmMr+P/+rakuaKGBaXz4RzzWWvZRf6KqSx8Jz1c1GbI8o8f24hJm52I7inBzjHh4lQ5KGmvpSrdudyw=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:76c7:: with SMTP id r190mr23316053vsc.196.1556281691089; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 05:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m3imvj9sk3.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <a91070f8-a4af-476d-ca70-80868e4a98f2@domblogger.net> <50e49b69-bf8a-1ee6-ffb5-8f1b24c2bb03@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <7083048f-f11a-17f5-db91-7654e910a999@domblogger.net>
In-Reply-To: <7083048f-f11a-17f5-db91-7654e910a999@domblogger.net>
From: Daniel Margolis <dmargolis@google.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:27:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CANtKdUdhY4jOH_+7T9_1hucnk-EPG8=z7=4Tb7imEGQOuWQNYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alice Wonder <alice@domblogger.net>
Cc: uta@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="0000000000006a3e3405876e11b4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/ZIkr1vZL93MWTI8tCjjjuyW_8nA>
Subject: Re: [Uta] tlsrpt
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:28:15 -0000

Hey,

Google should only be sending TLSRPT reports for time periods in which
there was mail sent. Per the RFC, these should be sent even if there are no
failures; the "success count" serves as an indicator that reporting works,
etc.

Alice, if you want to share with me (off list, if you prefer) an example
report that you believe to be an error, perhaps I can help investigate.

As for automated handling, I have experimented with
https://www.uriports.com/, which handles TLSRPT. I don't know much about
the people behind this service, but they offer automated parsing of TLSRPT
(and a bunch of others, like DMARC), which is nifty. :)

Dan

On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 6:53 AM Alice Wonder <alice@domblogger.net> wrote:

> On 4/14/19 11:47 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> > On 4/14/19 10:49 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
> >> Yes, and they are sending them to me even when there are no errors.
> >> They are sending them to my little used mail server when they have
> >> made no attempts to deliver to that domain.
> >
> > I'm surprised they are sending them to you when you say they are not
> > delivering to your server.
>
> They have sent to it before, just not during the time period for the
> report.
>
> It has two e-mail accounts, both are mine, and rarely used.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> Uta@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
>


-- 
How's my emailing? http://go/dan-email-slo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email