Re: [Uta] tlsrpt

Daniel Margolis <dmargolis@google.com> Sun, 28 April 2019 09:09 UTC

Return-Path: <dmargolis@google.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EC812008F for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 02:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pjAWqh2DVq0 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 02:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x934.google.com (mail-ua1-x934.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::934]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6967312008C for <uta@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 02:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x934.google.com with SMTP id t15so2579881uao.5 for <uta@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 02:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZJzOWYTZqTyguwJyivGKtP8o6NE0gwnCSinB1Rhrv9g=; b=jGoQB/qjlZXififjr4jMTWeNlUaVvgKc4rGihospQxXo6iuLqFy6UBoNSbHP/dlNRo ff53eBrx358wWxPeUltgIy89cLnHXYTGeD5j3G/AYsanjlK7BWwXkxiGSJ82FXlmkj/f FL/QhJWobd2kppJ5fZ9dDS561/1gmJNy8cozG0nL1go4CKjUFmNH322aJT4zia/O0i5K JRDEdOZ5uVVDPmqWaBu3c8airXfKn2ubX05k6rCKDanEupOEtZjH6jBZnlWg+wfVXIR5 DeXrJg/4UijqMc64DAa+/FI3wpI7EtzKhARXa/bqAFAyfjZVgA10xT/w7ohph1Djv2bN /+Rw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZJzOWYTZqTyguwJyivGKtP8o6NE0gwnCSinB1Rhrv9g=; b=lbL5EHkbWxPrkZQBxCtfQCqFsgXkqJC5J5ezIyaAYvYpa8dKgaz7t1pLh6RGmh3vFD P13alH/mILbVIbN/B/EFXqPTE4IYlirWIeCI2PX0sLyI7xf+/Sxm2+Vcv8HlL4ZjUtMm GipTVJ/cOMIPJBvPpXAvr+EtmGtGWlAHNKkIWCYuai5kmKaRkKZOcrRjR0UPH7f1UoeR 3kN4xQsf42HqPznBYiImxR4rtQEome0vMXZbO5eZ3lZCDNSpaNhxV/l38aGC3MEkBWii yhdJw5YIivCS5tebpRf+HWGTT9MUCfhKwAx80i5smVGW9jM7+AczRUS0gm7QaxxsBw+I GKLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUtTM+fvosfGVRJJbEBo5IePJ8kqp3m9+QyUfX34elaWcpjSoQd uTFuJo0sIJMk11UtgydB9cbJJMs5kmWlVtpFLacXllVR9gI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwrJ0j2hidLxUMWkijrm1CWdRTl0ud1bEMkF6tVNKvF0w+4j6ieBPB4Gc0H8+oxauF2b5klk8GSXp2FhUXfaro=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:59b3:: with SMTP id g48mr7600985uad.141.1556442550848; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 02:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m3imvj9sk3.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <a91070f8-a4af-476d-ca70-80868e4a98f2@domblogger.net> <50e49b69-bf8a-1ee6-ffb5-8f1b24c2bb03@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <7083048f-f11a-17f5-db91-7654e910a999@domblogger.net> <CANtKdUdhY4jOH_+7T9_1hucnk-EPG8=z7=4Tb7imEGQOuWQNYA@mail.gmail.com> <m34l6jctyq.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
In-Reply-To: <m34l6jctyq.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
From: Daniel Margolis <dmargolis@google.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 11:08:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CANtKdUd0WWkZKvNcA4QATpKfEX1Su4+RW93LdO-TzNHWjpifKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Cc: uta@ietf.org, Alice Wonder <alice@domblogger.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="000000000000675cb705879385d8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/a27J1yi2G-nrgrl4xFgwlusJHtg>
Subject: Re: [Uta] tlsrpt
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 09:09:15 -0000

Interesting. That's possible.

Actually, let me step back. Not to be stupid, but reading the RFC, is there
a clear statement on when an MTA should send TLSRPT reports? Sending them
to a domain to whom you've never communicated before seems a bit odd, but I
actually can't figure out (at a quick skim) if sending reports for periods
in which you did not communicate with the MTA is recommended or not.

It *seems* weird to me. But--and I realize this is an odd question--is it
clear that this is not working-as-intended per the RFC?

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:07 PM James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> wrote:

> >>>>> "DM" == Daniel Margolis <dmargolis@google.com> writes:
>
> DM> Google should only be sending TLSRPT reports for time periods in which
> DM> there was mail sent.
>
> They send me daily reports for each of my tlsrpt zones to which they've
> sent any mail since they started grabbing the .well-knowns.  But not for
> those to which they have never sent mail.
>
> A no-mail report looks like:
>
> {
>    "contact-info" : "smtp-tls-reporting@google.com",
>    "date-range" : {
>       "start-datetime" : "2019-04-26T00:00:00Z"
>       "end-datetime" : "2019-04-26T23:59:59Z",
>    },
>    "organization-name" : "Google Inc.",
>    "report-id" : "2019-04-26T00:00:00Z_redacted"
> }
>
> -JimC
> --
> James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
>


-- 
How's my emailing? http://go/dan-email-slo