IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Uta] UTA WG report

Orit Levin <oritl@microsoft.com> Thu, 30 March 2017 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <oritl@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9741292FD; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TuR-8vDeN4UZ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03on0138.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C50126B6D; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=tqPjjhmHwE2zrx0P77wengOGFm4hSN9OvyRKuEmYgyI=; b=mxRPv7EAFeAQSoXPcgyEBP7VFKw0hXQEWB/wWgR/ck4gWJpIkBJrEmrcnIndWXKaO6wnYEg4EZccYqLBKbVMGhpA+bm+ySSXxg/VQFi5Jgi2r4hnKJRS7LcBkzmmmuDdOXPw9tLq4odKfvvCBAs3qS/INipdqA3SHTA1KKEzLV8=
Received: from CY1PR0301MB2122.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.164.2.156) by CY1PR0301MB2123.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.164.2.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1005.10; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:13:05 +0000
Received: from CY1PR0301MB2122.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.2.156]) by CY1PR0301MB2122.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.2.156]) with mapi id 15.01.1005.013; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:13:05 +0000
From: Orit Levin <oritl@microsoft.com>
To: "saag@IETF.org" <saag@IETF.org>
CC: "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: UTA WG report
Thread-Index: AdKpiVl4npOFw8VXR1uQSoEzKgRD0A==
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:13:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CY1PR0301MB212290BDEA02EDE3ECEE0724AD340@CY1PR0301MB2122.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: IETF.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;IETF.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [31.133.149.103]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0301MB2123; 7:60H1jpqHzhwMsBKRlEw68BVRc9Yla8O8PbObN0BL4gEdpkybKkk7tj/PFSg0ylv1n0TqGDGhsDUKYG+cPrCjA4l/x8VwGscVAYD5nRJNV/aXd7EFkAibBxysmnB4IwGpA/j2219HKrr2Ku8zeYK38NguLABaapDGTJIs61ttTEW6740JwPsVijEQa+ZbsOGOFhbrsI6SDjtrmMf4uX3uD0QNHEMKoF45cEdz+nqtOWssmCLus/rA0bfCYtDC+YedCX5ZAMIofVR4AqxDlzcynKdIxyA4MgSxQv2YXB1gkCL2kN1pidZi0xusVLth5N/8mfpJJcgwudn6OSTeMb8Nyj1lnt5yX8FtpkOeQEQBv+0=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9606d3c6-3a11-414e-94a7-08d477a0cb54
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:CY1PR0301MB2123;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR0301MB212326160141F09479200707AD340@CY1PR0301MB2123.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201703011903075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:CY1PR0301MB2123; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB2123;
x-forefront-prvs: 02622CEF0A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39850400002)(39410400002)(39400400002)(39840400002)(39860400002)(39450400003)(31014005)(110136004)(6116002)(102836003)(33656002)(790700001)(6916009)(74316002)(25786009)(3280700002)(6306002)(2351001)(9686003)(3480700004)(54896002)(3846002)(86362001)(7696004)(4326008)(122556002)(3660700001)(8936002)(53936002)(5630700001)(66066001)(189998001)(38730400002)(54356999)(450100002)(50986999)(6436002)(10090500001)(86612001)(2501003)(8990500004)(77096006)(55016002)(7736002)(10290500002)(81166006)(5005710100001)(5640700003)(1730700003)(2900100001)(5660300001)(7116003)(99286003)(6506006)(8676002)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB2123; H:CY1PR0301MB2122.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CY1PR0301MB212290BDEA02EDE3ECEE0724AD340CY1PR0301MB2122_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Mar 2017 19:13:05.2435 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0301MB2123
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/pe2ZciPSnsQcFfUqski541N_3t4>
Subject: [Uta] UTA WG report
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:13:12 -0000

UTA WG met on Tue. All agenda topics relate to using TLS with e-mail protocols.



MTA-MTA interface: The drafts are very close to WG LC. The only real open issue remains the choice between Jason and tag-value format. Implementers choice is split 50/50. Vast majority (if not all) are OK with implementing either. The AD (Alexei) will suggest specific syntax for tag-value format. All interested parties (i.e., potential implementers) are encouraged to chime in on UTA list because we will be resolving this last issue in the upcoming weeks and moving the draft to LC.



MUA-MTA interface: the draft has been further updated. The relevancy (and the complexity) of the proposed protocol has been questioned during the meeting. Even if the answer is "irrelevant", the BCP part of the draft is still very useful. The authors will investigate and proceed according to the results. (Potentially, the draft could be shorten or split and the status changed to BCP, Experimental, or both.)



REQUIRE-TLS draft: the draft has been discussed and found valuable for specific critical cases. It was suggested to continue working on the draft with an intent to be adopted by UTA or other (new) WG going forward.

Orit.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email