IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-17

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Wed, 14 March 2018 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A2B1273E2 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8yjfgouD3sy8 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [108.5.242.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DB3E127337 for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.196.194.147] (32-196.icannmeeting.org [199.91.196.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 968F77A3309 for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ietf-dane@dukhovni.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <f5a3f45961fa4f46bf8e8cd269936451@COPDCEX19.cable.comcast.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:58:18 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: uta@ietf.org
Message-Id: <83360C7D-90DD-4546-A296-366EB07031CD@dukhovni.org>
References: <152054808275.11187.13276762980596133506@ietfa.amsl.com> <0423F6BE-6CF5-4DBA-A241-56142268D067@dukhovni.org> <5960ef77-8310-0b05-6c89-46b35023f314@joelhalpern.com> <f5a3f45961fa4f46bf8e8cd269936451@COPDCEX19.cable.comcast.com>
To: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/wJPFhKOvKEwH8NqaR6dtxUkiNzk>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-17
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:58:23 -0000


> On Mar 14, 2018, at 7:21 AM, Brotman, Alexander <Alexander_Brotman@comcast.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't see any reason a specific DKIM selector wouldn't be possible.

Much as I think this would be more secure, I don't think it is entirely practical.
The issue is that the systems that send the reports would then have to use a
different configuration to get the mail sent, and I think that's unlikely to be
feasible for most senders.

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email