IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4tov6transition] [BEHAVE] Any Experience with Using Behave's Stateless NAT-PT for IMS-SIP VoIP Application...

marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Sun, 26 September 2010 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F403A6B66; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.744, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id odKZzQ35JNmg; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340233A69A2; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from marcelo-bagnulos-macbook-pro.local (179.51.22.95.dynamic.jazztel.es [95.22.51.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A98BE5A1D; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:37:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C9F84EC.2080202@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:37:48 +0200
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; es-ES; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com>
References: <EC91E98C3BC6A34B917F828067B9335C1535E73180@PRVPEXVS07.corp.twcable.com> <C5280025-B399-40AE-A556-2850780818D4@cisco.com> <4C9F5222.5070907@cernet.edu.cn> <4C9F5852.8030907@it.uc3m.es> <15AC243C-8B36-49E0-B837-04CA728C5B32@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <15AC243C-8B36-49E0-B837-04CA728C5B32@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.0.0.1038-17668.000
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:36:30 -0700
Cc: Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>, v4tov6transition@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] [BEHAVE] Any Experience with Using Behave's Stateless NAT-PT for IMS-SIP VoIP Application...
X-BeenThere: v4tov6transition@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <v4tov6transition.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition>, <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v4tov6transition>
List-Post: <mailto:v4tov6transition@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition>, <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:37:18 -0000

  El 26/09/10 16:39, Tina TSOU escribió:
>
> B. R.
> Tina
> http://tinatsou.weebly.com
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2010, at 10:27 PM, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
>
>> El 26/09/10 16:01, Xing Li escribió:
>>>
>>> (1) IVI (stateless translation) can support IPv6 and IPv4 initiated 
>>> communications, while stateful translation can only support IPv6 
>>> initiated communication. So stateless translation should support SIP 
>>> better.
>> statefull translation is compatible with the NAT traversal techniques 
>> such as STUN, TURN and ICE, that should be taken into account i guess.
> Are there any two levels NAT traversal documents?
Not that i am aware of, actually, there is not a single level nat 
traversal document afaict.
But my point was that the same tools that are used to traverse NATs in 
IPv4 are useful to deal with NAT64.

Regards, marcelo



>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Behave mailing list
>> Behave@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email