Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sat, 28 August 2010 21:18 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD3A3A68F6 for <v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.18 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.181, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-t1+GYVHpXJ for <v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og108.obsmtp.com (exprod7og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.169]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69BD3A6879 for <v4tov6transition@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob108.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTHl9M8PBKha9Uh2MjJxykaGe7kHLW1DL@postini.com; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:18:47 PDT
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:11:46 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:11:46 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, huang cancan <cancanhuang110@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:11:45 -0400
Thread-Topic: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
Thread-Index: ActF9hy5IDt3oRggRqWNxRFzASDhhAA/u+XA
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B0151C78EF@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <AANLkTinUio_QE-gSQCjy2uTrSsrJB+iXuy-ALRDVguTS@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=rr7M+BrHgs7o1GZUUQyPBzhRwnzSqb=wwo0cq@mail.gmail.com> <CF9A27F88C4A465DA084331DE76A34BB@china.huawei.com> <AANLkTikegE4NWwv_J9WkZNds2yfYWX=d_fGzScBib2ga@mail.gmail.com> <F3C8E4AC-692D-4CF1-B01F-9BE4CB340889@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F3C8E4AC-692D-4CF1-B01F-9BE4CB340889@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IPv6 v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "v4tov6transition@ietf.org" <v4tov6transition@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
X-BeenThere: v4tov6transition@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <v4tov6transition.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition>, <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v4tov6transition>
List-Post: <mailto:v4tov6transition@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition>, <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:18:17 -0000
Fred, I am monitoring the conversation, but have been a bit slow responding to email. For the last two days I have been distracted, delivering both of my kids to college. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: v4tov6transition-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v4tov6transition- > bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:42 AM > To: huang cancan > Cc: IPv6 v6ops; Ron Bonica; v4tov6transition@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG > > Copying my AD. He's on the list, but I know I monitor more closely > discussions I am copied on, and I suspect he does as well. > > On Aug 27, 2010, at 6:51 AM, huang cancan wrote: > > > - Do the working group's activities overlap with those of another > > working group? If so, it may still be appropriate to create > the > > working group, but this question must be considered carefully > by > > the Area Directors as subdividing efforts often dilutes the > > available technical expertise. > > //This question was also discussed in the side group. I only copy > them here. > > > > 1) V6ops has not implemented item 4 in its charter and that it is > better to split the work into two WGs, to spread the workload. > > > > " 4. Publish Informational or BCP RFCs that identify and analyze > solutions for deploying IPv6 within common network environments, such > as ISP Networks, Enterprise Networks, Unmanaged Networks (Home/Small > Office), and Cellular Networks. " > > You no doubt went to http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/charter/ to > find the charter. May I request that you select "documents" on that > page or (equivalent) go to http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/ and > survey the RFCs output by the working group? It has gone to some > lengths to do this. > > > 2)I see the following text in v6ops charter: > > > >> The main focus of the v6ops WG is to look at the immediate > deployment issues; more advanced stages of deployment and transition > are a lower priority. > > > > I want to work on "more advanced stages of transition" that is out of > scope for v6ops. Some operators would like to focus on operational > issues related to the final phases of transition of v4 networks to v6, > i.e. the protection of v4 applications that need to continue to be > operational for all users while the networks are gradually transitioned > from v4 to v6. > > Let me put this in context. > > When Kurtis and I took over the working group in 2004, there were quite > a number of people that really wanted to talk about their favorite cool > tool for helping people make the transition. There was discussion at > the time of a separate working group for the purpose, and in any event > v6ops was instructed to not build protocols and with respect to > transition tool, to only generate requirements. That work eventually > went to behave and softwire. You will hear me tell people with some > regularity to take a draft to a different working group due to charter > issues, and this will be the usual reason. > > The continuation of IPv4 service during transition, what I call the > "coexistence phase", is at this point very near term transition issue, > and is the subject in part of > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn > "An Incremental Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) for IPv6 Transition", Sheng > Jiang, Dayong Guo, Brian Carpenter, 18-Jun-10, > <draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn-01.txt> > > which will go into working group last call on 12 September. I would > encourage the operators to read and comment on it. Frankly, the final > phases of transition will not be about "keeping IPv4 alive" as much as > "how best to turn it off". > > In any event, it has been a while since we updated the charter; if the > charter itself is at issue, we should discuss that. You are correct > that the question is no longer, if it ever actually was actually, "how > to deploy IPv6". The current phase is "coexistence" more than > "deployment", and perhaps the charter needs to say that. > _______________________________________________ > v4tov6transition mailing list > v4tov6transition@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition
- [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish … huang cancan
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… joanthan Peng
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Tina TSOU
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… huang cancan
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Fred Baker
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Scott Brim
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Fred Baker
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Rémi Després
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Randy Bush
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Rémi Després
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Ronald Bonica
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Ronald Bonica
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establ… Rémi Després