Re: [v6ops] draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-eam-01

Alberto Leiva <ydahhrk@gmail.com> Wed, 10 December 2014 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ydahhrk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575261A7017 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:48:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TurcxnAXpmVE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:48:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017551A87D2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:48:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gm9so2912865lab.12 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:48:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lgFvh268TntaKc1C+qWUmM23pRQt8rhI/UnnERakDkk=; b=dGGb9VnIEdqe9yP2fLQrQwsAv4l72T9bDGTeNp7lPBsrmP9g/cKITiUUFLKxpLjq0F ONOejUImjp+4g8SsCLQzbKlahogU9vBNN18uuZlXPwliv3g+G+TOF5gMBrR59m8L1wq3 AfoUTnrZH6afxtUoEiauPIezXTetjaAbZtX3Vt+6UY27pSXHSi4wCFGKG/CHKbAjE6Rd 2/ztchusu83QaHsMv6qZJsFzvcN0ExTuqxwOeJFVtGNCmpUB51HEQqd4wmARG2ex/kXe vV00PzzH9Jyd9GaLYY1ZGXZGU6DUm2FU0o3e7ramW8CbzK2thRrfOAVD94M4yHnkG2JX 7tnw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.159.229 with SMTP id xf5mr5310313lbb.64.1418233681151; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.35.100 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:48:01 -0600
Message-ID: <CAA0dE=UXTVggWQtp+FYMa3L8GfDwgX+4u_XDqPo6a19E9qpKXA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alberto Leiva <ydahhrk@gmail.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/0E70O1ieB-oFSR3LeVDTIGSA7E4
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-eam-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:48:18 -0000

>>> A) Remove all the normative RFC6145 protocol update language from
>>> draft-anderson-siit-dc, taking this document off the standards
>>> track, and have it describe the data centre use case only. Instead
>>> contain the required protocol update in a separate document dedicated
>>> to that purpose, i.e., draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-eam.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I'd like to see the protocol stuff in a separate -eam doc and leave the application description in -dc. That way future work can easily reference the -eam work even if its use case is outside of -dc.
>
>Agreed.
>
>   Brian

+1 :)
-dc sounds a little too low level, while -eam sounds like something
users would benefit from reading.
It's a lot easier to convince users and co-workers to read
simpler/shorter documents.

Sorry for being silly. Also sorry if this doesn't appear threaded.