IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] Intro to draft-patterson-intarea-ipoe-health-00

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 04 October 2018 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75032130E0C; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xmxo-nwVdcPw; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bugle.employees.org (accordion.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F155128CE4; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (219.103.92.62.static.cust.telenor.com [62.92.103.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bugle.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8600FECBE92; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:33:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A414B6EAFC9; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:33:16 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHL_VyCkGS8rV2Sfg80dOmLsPz8ahhhWUyN+muCCvFOu=XGvig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 15:33:16 +0200
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, "v6ops@ietf.org list" <v6ops@ietf.org>, int-area@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ED659321-D3C3-42DA-AA05-2786DEDE353F@employees.org>
References: <CAHL_VyDqrn4jmkWxqXJEgaBaJqy-RdqNvjPH=SWc5brpcScE4Q@mail.gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DED59D4@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <CAHL_VyAXuDnESoKcowBug-VTkw0_qpK-5qjnQ6ATz-cko2UgrA@mail.gmail.com> <56B2584A-CD70-4EA9-A7B1-06447B0F1667@employees.org> <CAHL_VyCkGS8rV2Sfg80dOmLsPz8ahhhWUyN+muCCvFOu=XGvig@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/0sXqoarhhihVM0uX9GSskSr1orA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] Intro to draft-patterson-intarea-ipoe-health-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:33:23 -0000

Richard,

> As a side-note, is it really that challenging or slow to get a new
> DHCP option assigned?  Perhaps I'm showing my naivety here.

Getting the DHCP option itself isn’t hard. But then you need to get it deployed in DHCP servers, you need to get it deployed in DHCP clients.
And you need to add linkage between the health checker and DHCP.

Harder from implementors perspectiv and harder from deployers perspective.

Does the extra work add value? It is certainly going to add significant amount of time.

Cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email