Re: [v6ops] IETF 99 Meetings and agenda
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Sat, 17 June 2017 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=1341fa1d60=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF652129C4B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R2x-lxey4Hkx for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9570912940F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1497736827; x=1498341627; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=F3qYj8c7niSmYLvkntZLGAbPg k08UsE9i4S5IWx6nxs=; b=IpVE/lzGc+pZtRIq85M5F5kpMlPxak/QIeUwUdyCx X5iTj/TqDZvCoOnSjtNa9XjvB8zoc0d42Q0e/CQGN4J8DkHged/T+30x+vMzgzgh 9J+IRqgtz3YVp11wH4bQxt+sDhAmtMVMpimVLGImEE1FhOnu80+azJKnV3c9/sFZ Is=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=pJ2ZpIckogAfWxY2lC55WXyaCN/C9LeWUA4qdn/qcpgoxkU9mUKxZXaRdCi+ kttaWKNMZI2n5U8I+k3ij8ilH1SGyAsMOF5NYH2oUS4HF6KWkuh7D8aCD IqlVPYhzNecGWMlEyl3j6iZAXAxhzKjTlAMbr4RnTn61k4ImQrMEe0=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Sun, 18 Jun 2017 00:00:27 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Sun, 18 Jun 2017 00:00:26 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005452785.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 00:00:25 +0200
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:170617:md50005452785::jYeeMVm8xUvOIL84:00002UnX
X-Return-Path: prvs=1341fa1d60=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 00:00:24 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <168D56C0-F9B6-4E1D-9ABB-7D5A088D35C2@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] IETF 99 Meetings and agenda
References: <F6ED3A7D-4FAF-40E6-9731-83FE627C12F7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F6ED3A7D-4FAF-40E6-9731-83FE627C12F7@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/14S5VuciFA11kvC8-3a49s3qz1A>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF 99 Meetings and agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 22:00:34 -0000
Hi Fred, I believe it makes a lot of sense to have a single slot for all the different options of the RFC7084-bis related documents. I don’t think it means a lot of extra time, may be 4-5 extra minutes for a couple of slides for each additional document explaining the differences from the actual WG item one. Probably the key think here is to take a decision if we want it in a single document vs split, and in case we choose split, what choice. I don’t know if you agree on that, but I think it can save some discussion time if we can call for a poll in the list, for a week or so, which will mean I’ve time to submit a new version of each document (or only for the WG choice according to the poll results), before the cut-off. Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Responder a: V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org> Fecha: sábado, 17 de junio de 2017, 22:28 Para: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org> Asunto: [v6ops] IETF 99 Meetings and agenda A preliminary IETF agenda has been posted at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/agenda.html. We are scheduled Tuesday morning and Thursday afternoon. Any heartburn, please let us know now, as the final agenda is to be posted Friday 23 June. I have also posted a preliminary working group agenda as well, at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/agenda/v6ops/. We have some remaining time (about an hour), and are considering a fourth invited talk and several recently-posted drafts: 2017-06-14 draft-linkova-v6ops-conditional-ras 2017-06-12 draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-transition 2017-06-11 draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis2 2017-06-11 draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis4-hncp Additional new drafts could arrive anytime between now and July 3, and the chairs solicit comments on the above documents, with a view to gauging working group interest. _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- [v6ops] IETF 99 Meetings and agenda Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 99 Meetings and agenda JORDI PALET MARTINEZ