Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip
"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 15 May 2014 22:31 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD441A01C4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 May 2014 15:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ri0fXZqYLpK1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 May 2014 15:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814F91A01AF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2014 15:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1003; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1400193062; x=1401402662; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Aojn7tFGW1yRTgRaxlMpIDDWBJ5nwOEdZf3+FqT9/BU=; b=SmPJL5+qsjqhFzJBHqQMO4tWOIfgCK5Wx715eCAXoWtb2zn5f55zZIu+ cBxPPIJv4jZOi75Q4UZUjRyRztuHGYVJRbKukv12WEa4Xwx3kdGTJ0idk n1DudtCWvB5EATysFglySqf192QEbUPzUc3G9jbFIZyG23bsxJZxuiCuI Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFAMM+dVOtJA2L/2dsb2JhbABZgwaBJ8UfAYESFnSCJQEBAQMBeQULAgEIDjghESUCBA4FDg2IEgMJCMs7DYYXF4w5ghUHgyuBFQSRNYE5hHCBc40qdoR0gzaCMA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,1062,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="325231137"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 May 2014 22:31:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4FMV2n3011542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 15 May 2014 22:31:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.239]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 15 May 2014 17:31:01 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip
Thread-Index: AQHPcI1ZD3xRW9efUUKK6udTGgvr2g==
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 22:31:00 +0000
Message-ID: <4FCED5AE-F95C-46E1-9325-46B639CA9696@cisco.com>
References: <201405061245.s46CjNEi013073@irp-view13.cisco.com> <5373082E.5040007@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGS=WtFA6yDG=2-c_-OCkwUK_X-K_LVOJB7vggnYDe_D7A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGS=WtFA6yDG=2-c_-OCkwUK_X-K_LVOJB7vggnYDe_D7A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.123]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B69FE73F-BF51-41E5-8FEF-ACD50766B8E7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/1j8hQCU2urnNUB03ArNhCgjWo6M
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 22:31:11 -0000
On May 14, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote: > The common Android solution > for this is to just use 192.0.0.4/32, only 1 IPv4 address is needed > for 464XLAT to function on Android between us girls, I would expect most usages to be point-to-point and /32. But of course I wasn’t asked.
- [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip Alejandro Acosta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip Ca By
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip Fred Baker (fred)