IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D.ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs

james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6F8131B76 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zvfouYB48bCk for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD2F2129B15 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l81so847615wmg.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=GHpHCcD/U32svJPowT5WmkHTvJtCqg8HwhQaRHVutvg=; b=Gdcd9I9j6ZaLJuJSYhUjAk1voNcXA8bivmRmHQlFB7IeIMQU8cVngmnHEfQMJYhV2x GazpxMXm/jmAInjQRPSVxVuB8i6JEVJ/UjAhQ6vO/hOi9YXSXYaLFe6ZGfZzD9sSWmpm O2X47M+etix3GE0V6waA8MJvNhCBVXVrygFFdpfq70t136UbOvos8i98LvFQIpaDc4XG QUrnG8iHXB/fwJavf/pti++Y+WnalA6CR+iyCpxtRsKrMWH8w4waS1sNpH/0UlA9ZT+E gfIvq+bqPeV8u4Y8+fj6qHVxJ11X8mRzIIkujSzqv6vHDM1hjMl7EeCwnBRHEXff1SaQ sjFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=GHpHCcD/U32svJPowT5WmkHTvJtCqg8HwhQaRHVutvg=; b=UTO5a/emJw98IYude0ytm5ePe2IXkfp9yptSxKxb/gec6LQGP5CL7etQ5JdRBZlcdH 5KUiVFrt+5tCaVssEdrAtrzeBTX2C570t+Y+ScIYUjaZGotAqVbPjnRNYRqCQzpKXJxI dljXv8cZEGohccwGC7WfgWr6hVzhS4QdboFvLD/63xOKBZyBhUlk0EF4qwo+C/EyyTDi hRNXVFGEqf981s4Lru+fGTmwGNrIhA8Q+SXzIfEAdjGXr/gz/8gqpkc6G6VfCxRHy7+A fWwkO4GjSgvH/JjJwDSGs7/hzjGZjDuCs1SFn6TrAB0IB9iaH58gS2+cFzaOhMLS3y5X eTvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111eXjEh5nLLWUiWVMnIJEftkobxQ2FK/tGx8UKbwt80PYYUlebK +rTn2s52dHgxO5S0
X-Received: by 10.28.173.6 with SMTP id w6mr246305wme.12.1500477266280; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:2dea:67ec:e0fa:d8b2? ([2001:67c:370:1998:2dea:67ec:e0fa:d8b2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c16sm172618wmh.41.2017.07.19.08.14.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Message-Id: <9D75D02D-4ABA-4E08-A7E8-0410275DD2CF@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D1F58B70-59B8-4FF0-AE6F-8D44DA3861F7"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:14:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <01e901d30045$8a502d10$9ef08730$@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Russ White <7riw77@gmail.com>
References: <D4FEE152-FA00-4D38-B445-F97BD9103887@google.com> <01e901d30045$8a502d10$9ef08730$@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/1lPePyvAdYeyF0xoUCyyUF29ssQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D.ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:14:29 -0000

On Jul 19, 2017, at 06:14, Russ White <7riw77@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> As I just said at the microphone, I think it would be helpful to add something to
>> this document that connects to Host Address Availability Recommendations
>> [RFC 7934]. In simple terms, we need routers to be capable of making
>> addresses available to hosts without requiring them to make an explicit
>> request for each one, and this draft should cite RFC 7934 accordingly.
> 
> Thanks! I've added this to my list of things to do for the next revision.


And another one is a RECOMMENDATION for configurable support for “Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements” [RFC 7772].

--james woodyatt <jhw@google.com <mailto:jhw@google.com>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email