IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-04.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 11 May 2015 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F0A1A0049 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2015 18:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Ozy4OoVnogp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2015 18:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A78DC1A003A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 2015 18:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oign205 with SMTP id n205so93978107oig.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 2015 18:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=gihpMPhZubHAKO9Bn5wOpvaIONr/YiDng7tsmfK+6l4=; b=m+u9nyE5NvecKbWl/dlcIKpJ0Z9NfkboULEaxi0Jh2WAxEen7g3GPqQ6DkZ5U5DpGB nHSZrgkQEcyWEdToYdM2O5DfsaRRnoeZV+NoQ5jkrhXY42IoFeamR4r/2xZX+YNix47M FsJjRAfI0rCKi70w9S9flpdB3IKDWTZsEXXKfmFlUEPM+lK6VqpDImzZ5NMJJBK+wWhn zckSRs+xWcDZP7r7ELAoQUQ/uk9i0HVF0/5Sxb3/3taMAecmOLglyOEEqwEN6Cid9rsU +e1Qezct4RaeRE/jNUmoFhvZ7KZ1RIq0jvdbS94Xzl22gWvWzeS6CTJf9fLTgPhOlc0a Bc6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gihpMPhZubHAKO9Bn5wOpvaIONr/YiDng7tsmfK+6l4=; b=NhMoEZLJ78GxbXaT3ZkqTt+Y54SdywvvtWYkBPW+C03sRZVUi03wheZu2nsqvdOOn1 lwncuMWD/G7nr2gdwRQ0PSW/qjTuyJpwVNhGXQu5if9kckWsYbhqUpI8xzDc69wXPXj9 vzkkcfeBzZRpWtXv9DEtkAj0xYbrGzXwmUgDf+n0qFRaNZD3Tcd1thrXgnxBKTHN/Ro5 YiWm1Z3ToJ/o04v32q2EbPm/iWgrIe+zo+HDIGhSSq7aRQYc7w/FSJp8zi/8WZv3gACl V95PdDD2BWg+7OJ+AqvN+RfxSB/6KM0EgtLAr/Bb2tPKixSoC5Cd+kis1to3n5YsW5Jn cXyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbDXfNBIUXiUtrryqPfx0BKG+BcegibO8SO7vHoFO8p3XIX3XALoLPzwrDE82NA5Sok96U
X-Received: by 10.202.201.3 with SMTP id z3mr5999426oif.130.1431309580872; Sun, 10 May 2015 18:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.160.65 with HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2015 18:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqeWHtS6J3FS_KkbL1B9Bek1DJ9=3X2MtJiDp__Hk=XVBw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150504022905.7563.62204.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F062445F-7D1D-4E4E-B236-5192EEBAF817@cisco.com> <CAJE_bqeWHtS6J3FS_KkbL1B9Bek1DJ9=3X2MtJiDp__Hk=XVBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:59:20 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3ryKHHDjqeRZzKAo3=U73bp3n6iWbb+v6P5NC5RVG7tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134e9a021e3c90515c4bbb9"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/3ICMC6WrsgnwnlgbKRO6YnhI7Q4>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-04.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 01:59:43 -0000

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:27 AM, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:

> > Observing the posting, let me invite commentary on it.
>
> It seems that the main points of my previous comments
> - http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg20179.html
> - http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg20200.html
> still apply.
>
> So my conclusion is the same:


What he said.
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-04.txt
shows that there are no changes in this document except that the text from
appendix B moved to section 3 and some minor editorial changes. I don't see
why such minor changes should materially change the WG's position on this
document.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email