RE: about the coexistance scenarios in draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-01
<teemu.savolainen@nokia.com> Mon, 28 July 2008 06:53 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BDC28C195 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OtRe-ZRgdCaP for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F99728C194 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KNMbj-000AKO-DA for v6ops-data@psg.com; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:53:23 +0000
Received: from [192.100.122.230] (helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com>) id 1KNMbg-000AJr-TY for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:53:22 +0000
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m6S6r55g024420; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:53:06 +0300
Received: from vaebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.24]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:52:50 +0300
Received: from vaebe102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.12]) by vaebh103.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:52:43 +0300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: about the coexistance scenarios in draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-01
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:52:41 +0300
Message-ID: <DC237AE116C10E4C9AD162D6C2EE62FEED7D47@vaebe102.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <86E8999A-35B7-4594-B793-446B2E1C18FB@muada.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: about the coexistance scenarios in draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-01
Thread-Index: AcjwMs7oLs78duH7Qn+5BeKqWl11BwASRNJw
References: <4889E7AF.6080903@it.uc3m.es> <86E8999A-35B7-4594-B793-446B2E1C18FB@muada.com>
From: teemu.savolainen@nokia.com
To: iljitsch@muada.com, marcelo@it.uc3m.es
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2008 06:52:43.0180 (UTC) FILETIME=[88CDE6C0:01C8F07E]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>
>The situation we want to reach is where hosts can have just >IPv6 connectivity and still be fully functional. Assuming all applications are supporting IPv6, or also including cases where host may be running IPv4-only apps? What I'm wondering is that if a translation solution is designed to assume fully IPv6-capable host (including all random third party softwares), then it might be less usable in near future than tunneling based solutions. I mean if for v4-only applications host needs to anyway find a way to provide IPv4-connectivity, for what purpose it would need translation services? For IPv6-only applications? I would assume it takes quite a while before all applications are IPv6-capable, and that all devices behind a host (such as gaming consoles etc) are also IPv6-capable. Or can we assume applications to be IPv6-capable in timeframe operator would be interested to provide IPv6-only connectivity? Or should a host internally implement v4->v6 translation, thus making a host look like fully IPv6-capable towards network? Teemu
- about the coexistance scenarios in draft-ietf-v6o… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: about the coexistance scenarios in draft-ietf… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: about the coexistance scenarios in draft-ietf… teemu.savolainen
- Re: about the coexistance scenarios in draft-ietf… Iljitsch van Beijnum