[v6ops] Re: WiFi without IPv4, no longer a rare experience.

Antonis Chariton <daknob@daknob.net> Mon, 29 June 2026 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <daknob@daknob.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: v6ops@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0427D109A3B05 for <v6ops@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 01:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1782721103; bh=fV/vvWAAIpqlEMASYunGMeWqCflkiJgBXC7W4jRPq1M=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=yFC/uPVvCOcxGv96Mt3oHI3T/MlyHvd6K5tHU/EVTO1DaYrgChA4/Re/qem7jmA2Q yB0RaT0WdYXN6Hg37h93PzrQVhxZPJoqj9AIW1h2inZ1qzjrqPF2uMrtkkvqhwMV0K XwbR5JDRskjNIny2FDqTQ9Heu884moop5d1YAoPg=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=daknob.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b7rlGJiKTn_V for <v6ops@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 01:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dione.s.daknob.net (dione.s.daknob.net [IPv6:2a04:c44:e00:5c37:46d:a8ff:fe00:969]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40BCF109A3AD8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 01:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=daknob.net; s=dione0; t=1782721094; bh=fV/vvWAAIpqlEMASYunGMeWqCflkiJgBXC7W4jRPq1M=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=Hn3yNaLCJXdl2I3BVv3cDx2N+K9hrofdiTPF2G1AstLJuU15lBkmK1onO8ts+rmaF Om8zc0UbXHIPs/aoJZc+4MXTkO1DU2scg9aH6lIVssxctj4qSeqb1c4NqwdwBNKpMw UDw2uGifnE46FGcPHhasLpDi5LPToGqmawbF6wyJM8twWs0a2RKtB1siradegZxNZY /4IqrUDIAUBvKNWc8EPCo9tBoX1gpozb8XRqlHmZA4SAdOCMx7DEuomRmaMlCYHIHz uXZ0g+mBoUA1JQoy/4caz5ar6hejpR6txP0jzUpTKYlac3tjx72+Rlsj2Vtbum+YRB QruZcl4ZvwE+g==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a0d:3dc0:111:111::11]) by dione.s.daknob.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3C2A87C52; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 08:18:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: Antonis Chariton <daknob@daknob.net>
Message-Id: <ABB0B27D-E12B-4B3D-9AF4-D5C0F8048EF0@daknob.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DFEF138D-167E-4DC0-8163-BE66B9A68E00"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.600.51.1.1\))
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:18:01 +0300
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLLs+PxrusQ=u6MJ16hUe0Rjbu1s9KajMdbqEDixzDO3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <545471956.74380.1782584042855.JavaMail.zimbra@zmcc-3-mailbox-1.zmailcloud.com> <CAHw9_iLLs+PxrusQ=u6MJ16hUe0Rjbu1s9KajMdbqEDixzDO3w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.600.51.1.1)
Message-ID-Hash: XZNKSVTPIVJSHI3WRRISQHC4LSJPWTQQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: XZNKSVTPIVJSHI3WRRISQHC4LSJPWTQQ
X-MailFrom: daknob@daknob.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: WiFi without IPv4, no longer a rare experience.
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5-R-N5ucTpBYQ2qgtrNi-H3nRnE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>


> On 28 Jun 2026, at 23:14, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
> How sure are you that this isn't just IPv6-Mostly (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00.html)
> 
> The IPv4 exhaustion argument doesn't really sound right to me - 10/8 is free, and coffee shops, hotels, etc generally just NAT everyone to a single or very small number of addresses. This is often just whatever their ISP provided.

Most places use the ISP provided CPE which is designed for home use. They change the SSID / Password to the store’s name, and leave everything as is. This means 192.168.1.0/24 and 86400 lease time. Given e.g. 10-20-30 devices for equipment (PoS, PCs, …) and staff, if the place sees more than 200 devices (each customer could be 2-3+ with watches) in a day, the aren’t any addresses by noon / afternoon, and everyone else is IPv6-only by then as an IPv6 /64 runs out after an IPv4 /24.

I’ve personally seen this, at least in Europe, in tens of places (I don’t want to say hundreds). I’ve also been asked by friends who own cafes and restaurants why after some point people can use Instagram / facebook but when they click the links to the websites they don’t always work. Switching from 192.168.1.0/24 to 192.168.0.0/20 and reducing the lease time to 3600 immediately makes the problem go away.

> Your experience also differs from mine - I much much more often get a v4 address and no v6 address…


This is unfortunately the reality for everyone else who used a “custom” / “enterprise” / “advanced” solution for hotspots. Almost anything with a captive portal. The companies that make these don’t always bother, the people who set them up don’t bother / know, and of course there’s always the case of ISPs not supporting v6 too.

Antonis