IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Windows 10 doesn't honour 'M' flag in RA

Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com> Tue, 12 December 2017 07:40 UTC

Return-Path: <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFF21293F9; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:40:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MYg73m4mHw_y; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:40:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56D91293F2; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:40:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id x204so22042509lfa.11; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:40:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PCpmkq3307SrmqTTeWQVMn8McUSs/aAwK5oq9Be0T+8=; b=bGWazaVvWp5S0waWS+FZ24IcY3FJeX6JoIJAxBxg/2A9Z6ej1f84fFYwPqag/cy85t K4zxwTtbO1jG4ejJFuxuD1+Xod5/dCDhUZePKU8RAM3OQvymiK4x/Q2l0opz8pNzj1V9 kszRBlwPod5xoNUz09aPqsOfjJ0PKTZPzHZReVUOCzkWnPl7/yyg4mSfE1JX5h2nKz1O wE/X9qOoXm6alt+vPtXYGEZOfAt0JiM/8zIGJYsZdUKmEeh7WRFdtdaH4JONY4do3aqa 1ZZY16Y2TrpFd+KeD2G0sZhWP10uPOHuD4tCyEzIHPtYJIgvGZBHPdL9QTEWvksFizh4 0DBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PCpmkq3307SrmqTTeWQVMn8McUSs/aAwK5oq9Be0T+8=; b=Gnp95jlOfiQ35ZK+eBBm9bp/bCbGO4yoX8Qox8BtgwgV4e+gw/T0B2RcNtR9U5X9Cd IXwj8rWFqcsC631JL2y1+lxd3GHw57i1mNCyc4vPPxsNLbFua/GLlVQPY/ZDBgbnMAKR n5PSGMPGBmMP+bPnujJGheroegXmy/QACRx1BFm4SoWvUpSB9IPBtIr6d9+C5dlh83Jh EJ8sifSOaP3nWmoAVKWIP7XIHpt5GxTT6GwRer76hYmYJ2Am1l9obSPAmxg5eTEiE4qD 8kjeHZd5HPHsfWlom0e+gMAc92wIu7VHE+u7Cf8rxunfzhqYuexTldFPwynPsM/C+5EH +EgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJG/71hn2PPoAKFR40ahoeodHTXICVwMJ+98ug/cAn6uJMXKn8n jEGmnI9AY7Uz9Ik5jEcegQNjiBJiD1x7H+akOzE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou2rkFVV/ZKj0wigboCRbz+pBVnzRIeLjzozZxl+DT2AgTbG49bgib8ZttttkM/8FrmuQdW6CytyrAihquijDs=
X-Received: by 10.46.23.20 with SMTP id l20mr1440983lje.25.1513064433126; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:40:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.2.212 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:40:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxptEK5nZTVHwuzG0aK119Ns61cdfNT3JWPafTGcAxMeeg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANFmOtnJiKtBH9WuOjfAAaOxmrQ8SanU1ATiEY_zSA9DbAuUAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAedzxptEK5nZTVHwuzG0aK119Ns61cdfNT3JWPafTGcAxMeeg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:10:12 +0530
Message-ID: <CANFmOtm2SU13o3Wey1XqhQf0WuuTzm80XXPp7Q9UGiV6Kvh5DA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b6b6c0f10c005601fc405"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5TOPpreARRfEhNF_uDHOW7uJuiA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Windows 10 doesn't honour 'M' flag in RA
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 07:40:37 -0000

I mean that though the 'M' bit is set to 0, client initiated DHCPv6 Solicit.

Yours,
Naveen.

On 12 December 2017 at 12:55, Erik Kline <ek@google.com> wrote:

> What does it really mean, to "honour the 'M' flag"?  Those bits are
> advisory /at best/.
>
> On 12 December 2017 at 16:20, Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In our recent testing, we observed that Windows 10 doesn't honour 'M'
> flag
> > in RA.  It's not just Windows 10, same behaviour is observed with latest
> Mac
> > OS as well.  Is there any specification reference to support this?
> >
> > Your valuable input is highly appreciated.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Naveen.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > ipv6@ietf.org
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email