[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6tran-framework WGLC
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 18 January 2011 21:46 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D3628C0FC for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:46:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.158, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1wRlvC4INwnr for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:46:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C5D28C0E0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:46:14 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAKmZNU2rRN+K/2dsb2JhbACkXXOoJ5o3hVAEhG+GL4Mk
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2011 21:48:52 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com [10.32.244.221]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0ILmldJ007250; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:48:52 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:48:52 -0800
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com on Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:48:52 -0800
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:48:38 -0800
Message-Id: <EC7E8554-B169-444F-887B-835A703BAB9C@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6tran-framework WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:46:15 -0000
Oops. I managed to send this to v6ops@ops.ietf.org instead of v6ops@ietf.org. This is to initiate a two week working group last call of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6tran-framework "Framework for IP Version Transition Scenarios", Brian Carpenter, Sheng Jiang, Victor Kuarsingh, 30-Nov-10 Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to the list. We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the document as well as its content. If you have read the document and believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important comment to make. Note that there is one outstanding update, per http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg06239.html This and any other comments that come in will be wrapped up in a post-WGLC update.