IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs-02

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Fri, 21 April 2017 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6B2129516 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2jLrefbZa-L for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01on0116.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.33.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1EE3127868 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=iMi0hzM3zE69qeTn1AF2CKviqhyHc4vMktwrCxCTDeM=; b=GfQrMMqpFbJXR4MRQGBBYRZ8SbmhYhumkXeKM9h/Jt8wiuS/PfZmfeQBByVzW1VK/rmaqBU44tJlM8PcEAAooetkmpPb0ZLfX+69/h/yM6HJvoA9j8KFFnvE6IWCq3+TIoj40KkVC9ZysUJEt2nbd2qKaLfhn38kZpKXQCco7Ic=
Received: from BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.164.23.21) by BLUPR0501MB2052.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.164.23.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1047.6; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:20:57 +0000
Received: from BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.23.21]) by BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.23.21]) with mapi id 15.01.1047.013; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:20:56 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Comments on draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs-02
Thread-Index: AdKjJhGQY5pAI/PHRFaFoUctqzGS6gXgLQOAAAL819A=
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:20:56 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR0501MB20514F721AFD52C843119FD4AE1A0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BLUPR0501MB20513F21FE599ED243BA9AAFAE3C0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704211545060.5591@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704211545060.5591@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: swm.pp.se; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;swm.pp.se; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0501MB2052; 7:iYS8i5NE2KQZgGGAOd6vxvxiRFPp9IIA7hyi7ZzJNCTA1fnqjiCR+90nszFgDZZ2p2FdMfMR+0HJ1gGflm3x3IEDdgVKOoTkdZaWKGf0hPDNc0CkQbXTR33siFljp8O0IzkiAs6g43Tv0w6OXapmkuLdMA6xXjBiPHAcVttOc0zyZmPqJYSA499Gz1gbaaAECTHZJ7kdyV342d5Fpct7Cxe9qWDxDGo5XuA0YwkqUOxA2OiykUVVRWfg4eBLXVCghyZ0AzjyqprlIy6TKmfYU8Fe+djhpQsnYX93wdP7+g0taAsVxj6M7GXed2D6nQClLiP6iv/vna+8vFgyx67dtA==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 293eefdd-74db-4770-c82a-08d488ca0248
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2052;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR0501MB2052831F711D22BC10907929AE1A0@BLUPR0501MB2052.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(20161123562025)(6072148); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2052; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2052;
x-forefront-prvs: 02843AA9E0
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39400400002)(39840400002)(39860400002)(39450400003)(39850400002)(39410400002)(377454003)(13464003)(24454002)(252514010)(3660700001)(230783001)(2900100001)(7696004)(8676002)(8936002)(229853002)(3280700002)(6246003)(7736002)(305945005)(122556002)(38730400002)(74316002)(66066001)(9686003)(86362001)(189998001)(5660300001)(77096006)(3846002)(102836003)(6116002)(33656002)(2950100002)(2906002)(81166006)(6506006)(54356999)(6306002)(6436002)(25786009)(53936002)(53546009)(50986999)(55016002)(99286003)(76176999); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2052; H:BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Apr 2017 15:20:56.8057 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0501MB2052
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/7zm_Zh4t-WgkAg708bgBUrPsoLs>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:21:01 -0000

Hi Mikael,

When I made the comment that you quote, I was confusing Jumbo Frames with Jumbograms.

                                                                                Sorry,
                                                                                    Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mikael
> Abrahamsson
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 9:54 AM
> To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs-02
> 
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Ron Bonica wrote:
> 
> > 3) The title of Section 5.3 is "Maximum Transmission Unit and Jumbo
> > Frames". However, there is no further mention of Jumbo Frames. Could
> > we explore Jumbo's possibly with an eye towards deprecation.
> 
> I am strongly in favour of support of jumbo frames.
> 
> I would like to see the document specify an L3 MTU of 9180 as its SHOULD
> requirement. All major core router vendor supports this today. The reason
> for 9180 is that this is what RFC2225, RFC2492, RFC1209 mention.
> 
> Other comments:
> 
> 3.3 It would be good if the draft referenced for instance RFC8071 for
> Netconf-call-home and draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch-13 for zerotouch
> plug'n'play provisioning.
> 
> 5.4. The ICMP ECHO/REPLY requirement here opposes what's in RFC4890. I
> prefer what RFC4890 says.
> 
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email