IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Enterprise policies: :WAS Implementation Status of PREF64

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Fri, 01 October 2021 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2673A0B68 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 04:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JR6xMm2rDHUI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 04:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E48BF3A0AAF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 04:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1633089547; x=1664625547; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=HOvOOlL9SigKWOSssajb45atHmGeztjr+M+/rrbUnHk=; b=WZYL6B2JYVL+S8v6nN2KjiSUzFdesm+uHyDGxn4J5DLzu3HjWiBkXuaX WgXJ6qDkboe33EAu7edPWlKLcnPlifzaa/SCZlbEziR9FcdtwxBNn/IFT Ro/TgiY2IVQwcF07VG8o8NPhH0hjKIeMwhCoIn4it1iG6wsuJi6x6rYBE Fl4fGxpCwT2IYlJ6S0xSlOJ8+7tYo2fUK/MBW40zkisA3qpRbr4oMbtwx 1iDW0nBWqsSPM8u6V87A29kleEhDFTZzrkNNwUkMMGtD70UEriAKf7k/L nJt/G8HzjhUX1Clu+esfX4cTnNT+VdEHrP0R3WEecS/szWfhqsq5xTSAf A==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Oct 2021 13:59:03 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1E143D01 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 13:59:02 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433FA42460; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 13:59:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 3D5DD120C7F; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 13:59:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 13:59:02 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Owen DeLong <owen=40delong.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YVb4BsmgqjKbkPjs@Space.Net>
References: <CO1PR11MB48819C4DC3C8C17C975E9EC2D8AA9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB48819C4DC3C8C17C975E9EC2D8AA9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8g0nbmoO3cF8cUCU0Yuy1WS4oPE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Enterprise policies: :WAS Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 11:59:09 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 05:22:27PM +0000, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> Think about the things we can do with stateful ND AAC:

This sounds all really nice.  And we should have done this 10 years ago.

Now, this sends the message "stop your IPv6 rollout, because the IETF
is going to fix DHCPv6 and ND for good, eventually".

Is that what we want?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email