IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Should we meet at IETF 113?

Martin Huněk <martin.hunek@tul.cz> Sat, 29 January 2022 23:59 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.hunek@tul.cz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1F53A1669 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 15:59:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.814
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.814 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tul.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IPjpmj-eVlX3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 15:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bubo.tul.cz (bubo.tul.cz [147.230.16.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA5683A1667 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 15:59:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tul.cz
Received: from [IPV6:2001:718:1c01:72:2e27:d7ff:fe2e:c477] (unknown [IPv6:2001:718:1c01:72:2e27:d7ff:fe2e:c477]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bubo.tul.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38A59180651E2; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 00:58:57 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bubo.tul.cz 38A59180651E2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tul.cz; s=tul2021; t=1643500737; bh=JSS1UTKI2yLK/bBFkyky+TUU2MWbXKI4tcNA6AAp2Co=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=YWd7vCL/UHAgPX+fYVLYiBanr9Du18oObxOO/H2KKWReI8Of3Me6Z7U8hkhEwm7CM bIAIhmBWR1wuLLNFko21fiklThj5YsMcveS2V1+lNU+svHKEqPr3WXlJC3y7a51MdW T5MGvRYkngzvYLhKx8dBsFtFCCi9+7ud9y2De7vInntCK6QU+XFL5EhR17nywfE7+2 sYXf7oktcE0YVQTvIvu12jzwJ1ckLYbZFKvYuS+DrkMV71Mzmwb88ZZcmxz0t6Fd58 ASg8x3LBACUw6xVa6/MBueQbIxKxL4PEIFgSJQPkLzh4ujkqyPASdwrdiloohv4vdl JCKKH6xS/cDWA==
Message-ID: <0100ecd0-2f59-9fed-f4da-936597b9653a@tul.cz>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 00:58:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
Content-Language: cs-CZ
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <5DFA0E78-519D-43A7-BAFA-6AB91829806E@gmail.com>
From: Martin Huněk <martin.hunek@tul.cz>
In-Reply-To: <5DFA0E78-519D-43A7-BAFA-6AB91829806E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms030900060508060203040009"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9IuSzJmrIWWYQKjaibwebxSfX90>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Should we meet at IETF 113?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 23:59:07 -0000

Hi Fred, Hi all,

I'm also planning to submit an updated version of the "NAT64/DNS64 detection via SRV Records" draft [1]. Changes planted so far are mostly editorial to 00 version.

If there is an interest, I would also like to present at IETF 113.

Sincerely,
Martin

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hunek-v6ops-nat64-srv-00.txt

On 27. 01. 22 7:23, Fred Baker wrote:
> At this point, I can’t say that any of our posted drafts has much wind in its sails, and I don’t know of new drafts coming. I have requested a slot at IETF 113, but the chairs are seriously wondering whether we should meet.
> 
> If you plan to post a draft soon (e.g., by March 7), please drop a note to the list generating discussion on your proposed topic. If you would like to discuss IPv6 networks as a group of operators, please drop a note to the list saying that.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email