IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-vyncke-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-cookie

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Thu, 30 October 2014 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220A31A876B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gSjO6dc1ueDT for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu (darkstar.isi.edu [128.9.128.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2199A1A038F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.211] (mul.isi.edu [128.9.160.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by darkstar.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9UMERVf022268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5452B843.10209@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:14:27 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: fred@cisco.com, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <201410291508.s9TF8Ki1018634@irp-lnx1.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201410291508.s9TF8Ki1018634@irp-lnx1.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/AOca-UYmbefPKyDmJ1xAK8BfFAQ
Cc: draft-vyncke-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-cookie@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-vyncke-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-cookie
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:14:44 -0000


On 10/29/2014 8:08 AM, fred@cisco.com wrote:
> A new draft has been posted, at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vyncke-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-cookie. Please take a look at it and comment.

Under potential mitigations, is there a reason not to refer to the use
of alternate (non-IP address) host IDs?

E.g., as noted in RFC 6967 and
draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email