[v6ops] Re: Name Collision IPv6 Research Study - Public Comment
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 30 October 2025 19:33 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: v6ops@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC187F0F51B for <v6ops@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 12:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HqvHrLKduB2v for <v6ops@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 12:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FA787F0F50B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 12:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-292fd52d527so15164375ad.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 12:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1761852795; x=1762457595; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=asdWs8aX0RqT6H/5Cj2V3c8e0ZbSkg9oJ2rKTVn7Iwg=; b=g2ELzklExJLuAzQXD9cW4NSR5XGUaF0yuxQ5KbLSNtDuRCDWfbBWXfDGjZhF/BHjDV 6h+MQmvjJXuFsTVLVOgt/aqXViqLBLqUQ5k8qYgfBuC11AZ1gz2xT+7D8QoI1D0MlrIe VGWXr9/IQ/9cb5jKtJnMQnIBzxzSI9J3vMwFz2dXxcNLT/pFhZhtxKiXtr+ZR/zZmQ5K QsDqJ9FGQdGtmOV7/dV9fGVC6Q3LdijimSb30ANHYYK1aCF9SC05V3AhJ8bbHLJoejOx 0rDRKYhzpFTV13JXEAfI1wGVZlPlB2OrywZeh37cPuwdUA1hcZ0ljQBRI8Bw3ru8JbVR Lhkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761852795; x=1762457595; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=asdWs8aX0RqT6H/5Cj2V3c8e0ZbSkg9oJ2rKTVn7Iwg=; b=ukjk5k6qw+k+mGkwSha5gWrQokeTtXeFqd64TsOIb2WuVgo+sDsUBlybjegghmZAmj Mo4z/3VMek//KZ4HdBdQAMBEKjcc9YpbkBjaDpoMIJoWA7HPlCnMlp4wZ/55VX0/ZC76 jW2cBgPWSgZgk4mPLb9+93EvrCVhrBZl4OLZ26mefM4JpvKE+ufUOtYnLqQ1exd21Ut0 Cm9/GP6GFSpm2VbtNay1w5c7iUw0nYtQpLV12U6ttrUz8ihZHwCWnOYeqJ3P+nrOEZN4 Bj5Kz0+bRudai1qqdoXX6xKX8CPVxXvmCZR67gsnybYoTUfkMd1Hi0azLYbNoqpHD/zH uhgA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWe6Rii4rfu6PvORl909momQl51g2IFp+uI6SQPU3zYLCIujnIIQnajDfWqmZfZmjVaQPfnog==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy1qQMNyIR17ngf7lZHQPEdhy/mk774OXqnw9GMZT4L1GWNU4lc 8l6reZb4+huUWrulGNEDrBw65QPHAwXcEMlTaIi1rRkKAu2Gp2IlVp50
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctFA/GJpVU0SRNzEC03oJiO3VXVOx4BAmA47/jaRmobs7hDzdVDYtna7MgZ7oi /UK6pfIVg8lx5uHxcX4nTUOUe6njjDOdJjg7cJ7Yiuzr1QyopldLlnyhSL0Mte+1zOF+lL5HZLl F5HrQqos25q9dW8mpP3cW7qwe98PjPIzGZZLtfITm55+WFTnLnL/BteLdznZ/bRp4AipuqkCkZD Ja9QVhDBYFLEYuJ/2G8WLVllxMQanwL4k1dkU4F04fAdEDiG1ZiINkBXtnV37Fp1+bUldN+pFMK tWZiPLJgjuLpMTliyVDNa685wKX+GD+6RmBBLRFGSS4MbGf2OtpAUe6vQOEjqyu/KXS+juURDKv R8LtlIGPA9RD7eOaXYgQ3KARTfexvz7Jey9uNzf9TEUEZcVcoq8LK/o0qyURFlkF0GbeihQER95 jgn5TlDa/8N7fwYReXC51hXKJwPljIL4mifpnC1k5fDqd/47YJDXe6GCV/yP1a6zrb
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHvUcpZAO0JYj3Lp/LYDXculQoxew3c+Xn3ZhH+3Y48vNaGPFaYmsdalyeBiBmFXa14CWQUgA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c408:b0:293:e12:1bec with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2951a3ead0cmr12935905ad.20.1761852795067; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 12:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2404:4400:540a:800:8bdd:3b5f:46ae:fd4c? ([2404:4400:540a:800:8bdd:3b5f:46ae:fd4c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-29498cf4a53sm199437335ad.6.2025.10.30.12.33.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Oct 2025 12:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <417d70d8-ac66-4f21-8764-e0707d7756ff@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:33:10 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Francisco Arias <francisco.arias@icann.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <AD79F775-2CFC-420B-99FA-2802FF4757C3@icann.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AD79F775-2CFC-420B-99FA-2802FF4757C3@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Message-ID-Hash: JACW5Z242MJ6RQDJ6W76EES4CVIZM2Z6
X-Message-ID-Hash: JACW5Z242MJ6RQDJ6W76EES4CVIZM2Z6
X-MailFrom: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: Name Collision IPv6 Research Study - Public Comment
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/B2GCyjHDYtSDPCI6UJOKcGc618s>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>
Francisco, > ICANN requests that specific feedback (from individuals or the group as a whole) is ultimately provided directly into the public comment website. I'm sorry, but that is just the wrong process. You are suggesting an IPv6 special-use address, and that is something to be debated not in an ICANN process but in an IETF process. As is recorded in the relevant IANA registry [1], this is an assignment requiring IETF Review. In other words, ICANN cannot assign ffff:127.0.53.53; only the IETF could do so. The starting point would be an Internet-Draft aimed at the 6MAN working group. As you are probably aware, the discussion has started on this (v6ops) list and on the 6MAN list (ipv6@ietf.org) but nothing is going to happen until somebody submits an I-D. To be clear, in my opinion the requirement is a very reasonable one, but the choice of prefix and specific address is debatable, and various options have already been suggested. [1] https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml Regards/Ngā mihi Brian Carpenter (writing as an individual, but not forgetting that I was a signatory of the MOU published as RFC 2860). On 31-Oct-25 06:08, Francisco Arias wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > ICANN has opened a public comment period on a research study titled "Controlled Interruption IPv6 Research Study". The study focuses on extending ICANN's "controlled interruption" mechanism, previously implemented using only the IPv4 address 127.0.53.53 into the IPv6 realm, given the growing adoption of IPv6 (> 40 % of hosts). The public comment period runs from 20 October 2025 to 22 December 2025: https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/name-collision-ipv6-research-study-20-10-2025 <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/name-collision-ipv6-research-study-20-10-2025> > > Controlled interruption is a phase in the establishment of a new generic top-level domain (gTLD) that is designed to reduce the risk of name collision. During controlled interruption, certain DNS resource records, designed to interrupt resolution processes, are temporarily published at and below the gTLD name. The content of these DNS records is intended to minimize any harm that arises from such interruption. > > This study produces an initial list of candidate prefixes, followed by technical tests of multiple applications on popular end-user operating systems. The aim was to identify candidate addresses where DNS lookups returning that address did not result in any unintended external network traffic. A preferred candidate that met these criteria was identified: ffff:127.0.53.53, which is the IPV6 mapping of the original IPv4 controlled interruption address. > > This mailing list is being alerted to request input on this topic. While there will undoubtedly be valuable discussions on this list around various aspects of this proposal, ICANN requests that specific feedback (from individuals or the group as a whole) is ultimately provided directly into the public comment website. > > Regards, > > -- > > Francisco. > > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list -- v6ops@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to v6ops-leave@ietf.org
- [v6ops] Name Collision IPv6 Research Study - Publ… Francisco Arias
- [v6ops] Re: Name Collision IPv6 Research Study - … Brian E Carpenter
- [v6ops] Re: Name Collision IPv6 Research Study - … Mark Smith