Re: [v6ops] A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07
Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-6@u-1.phicoh.com> Mon, 06 March 2017 18:52 UTC
Return-Path: <pch-bF054DD66@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104EA12996E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:52:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ilWeg9PxvDSu for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:52:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo6-tun.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2001:888:1044:10:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFA9129967 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:52:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net ([::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (Smail #127) id m1ckxkF-0000DJC; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:52:31 +0100
Message-Id: <m1ckxkF-0000DJC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-bF054DD66@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <CAN-Dau17q_BrUuzfvB1mLDt6p5UxYikphWaHpa8VQ2L-3kx-DA@mail.gmail.com> <a484b60f9d9b4fcea24dc320c550da2c@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <ee764408573b4db4b22e58c4ea5f289c@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <2c0ab33b-abbe-caf1-6147-0c583d7f5d61@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau0bSPiubeDOFeJAg6H0wP0ZNDS514eedmJtkOqHTXWOOw@mail.gmail.com> <D6D5B476-7F21-4F49-A81D-C2A11C30ADEC@google.com> <453e5b4160514907bc1bb822770e0cac@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <ABE47051-FBFC-460F-89B0-FFD451410F7B@google.com> <m1cjviu-0000EYC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <5BC57F0E-50FD-4452-853F-A08291C91EB1@google.com> <m1ck5mu-0000GaC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <5B4AFF50-8CA9-4134-8CE2-A383DB5F8BF5@google.com> <m1ckxfo-0000IMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:47:55 +0100 ." <m1ckxfo-0000IMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:52:31 +0100
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BirN7o2BuMET1B1Ne4Wg_lN1lYg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:52:34 -0000
>If your stack only does this when the A bit is set, then I don't care >that much. I'm perfectly happy if SLAAC remains at 64 bits and anything >else requires DHCP or manual config. This should have gone to 6man. But may be interesting here as well as some interpretations of RFC 4862 seems to make it impossible to have onlink prefixes that are not /64.
- Re: [v6ops] A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc429… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc429… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc429… james woodyatt