Re: [v6ops] IETF109:: IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirements

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 30 November 2020 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8AD3A0FF7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:47:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-ClSkDXFzsd for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:47:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D69153A0FD5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:47:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 0AUHlUVh014096 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:47:30 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C4D57207F0D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:47:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4A2207EFE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:47:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.11.244.229] ([10.11.244.229]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 0AUHlUh6007656 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:47:30 +0100
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <DM6PR05MB634846E24826EF244B6AD4B8AEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <38cb7e50-a44f-0fa8-dd70-8caa7846cb78@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:47:30 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR05MB634846E24826EF244B6AD4B8AEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Cp9ElpIPRXTmOGgi168SoeM11iA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF109:: IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirements
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 17:47:42 -0000


Le 30/11/2020 à 17:57, Ron Bonica a écrit :
> Folks,
> 
> We didn’t have much time to discuss presentations at IETF 109. So, this 
> week, the chairs invite discussion of Ramesh Chandra’s presentation 
> IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirements 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/slides-109-v6ops-ipv6-only-adoption-challenges-and-standardization-requirements-03>.
> 
> We will discuss each remaining presentation in the weeks to come.

Hi,

Thank you for pointing this.

During the online meeting I remarked that the Page 4 says:
"IPv6-only for 4G VVM User Equipment (UEs):
  - 90% get IPv6-only (/64 prefix) for VoLTE"

I wanted to get confirmation that is the way that it is?

UEs getting IPv6-only is a great step forward.

But the /64 prefix for an UE might be a relatively limiting aspect if 
considering mobile hotspots.

Alex

> 
>                                                     Ron
> 
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>