Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-domain-ipv6only
Machh <machh@chinatelecom.cn> Thu, 07 July 2022 06:56 UTC
Return-Path: <machh@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB62C15C6CD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 23:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QmVKYCwy0aPK for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 23:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B62BC15948C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 23:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.188:41354.263743025
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-219.142.69.78 (unknown [172.18.0.188]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 6E89D2800A0; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 14:56:25 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 71095673@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.188]) by app0023 with ESMTP id b5fcd6b886a64eb98a0d77b59900308a for fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 14:56:27 CST
X-Transaction-ID: b5fcd6b886a64eb98a0d77b59900308a
X-Real-From: machh@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.188
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: machh@chinatelecom.cn
From: Machh <machh@chinatelecom.cn>
Message-Id: <DB967C5E-8606-4A46-A16D-5E000FC47AEB@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_69012C98-B2CA-499C-BFDB-B0534DDA76C2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\))
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 14:56:24 +0800
In-Reply-To: <mailman.128.1657134003.9329.v6ops@ietf.org>
Cc: Chongfeng XIE <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>, xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
To: fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com
References: <mailman.128.1657134003.9329.v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.40.0.1.81)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/DRyP-z8CBs-MKFYtQ-jDCGbmMJk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-domain-ipv6only
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 06:56:32 -0000
Hi Fred， Thanks for your information, I noticed that SNAC is at the stage of BOF and we will keep a close look at it. Kind regards Chenhao > On Jul 7, 2022, at 03:00, v6ops-request@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org> wrote: > > From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>> > Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-domain-ipv6only > Date: July 6, 2022 at 11:48:08 GMT+8 > To: Xipengxiao <xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> > Cc: "xiechf@chinatelecom.cn <mailto:xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>" <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn <mailto:xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>> > > > > >> On Jul 5, 2022, at 3:39 PM, Xipengxiao <xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: >> >> 1. Section 4: I think the draft identifies a problem that may be worth solving, that is, there is a need for multi-domain IPv6-only solutions to eliminate unnecessary v4-v6 conversions in the middle. > > Dumb question: It seems to me like we're really looking for something similar to BGP between the domains. Would the concept discussed in SNAC be of value? ———————————— 马晨昊/Chenhao Ma 中国电信股份有限公司研究院 13366626492/(010)50902575 machh@chinatelecom.cn
- [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-domain-… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-dom… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-dom… Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-dom… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-dom… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-dom… Machh
- Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-dom… Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-reqirements-multi-dom… Chongfeng Xie