Re: [v6ops] Enterprise multihoming (again): draft-linkova-v6ops-conditional-ras

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Jen,
Per your presentation today, slide 11 asking "potential triggers", and 
slide 12 green and blue paths.

The default route as a trigger.

An obvious trigger is the presence of the default route.  If the Router 
uses a default route towards ISP1 then it should prefer to advertise on 
its other interface defrouter capability together with the PIO 
containing the prefix it has for ISP1.

If on the other hand the router uses a default route towards ISP2, then...

Alex

Le 03/07/2017 à 13:38, Jen Linkova a écrit :
> I received some comments off-list, so -01 version has been submitted:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-linkova-v6ops-conditional-ras/
> 
> - a co-author added;
> - some clarification added to the "Topologies with Dedicated Border
> Routers" section;
> - a lot of typos, missing articles and commas fixed ;)
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Jen Linkova <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Well, better late than never, right? So following the discussion on
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-00
>> and the sad fact that default address selection rule 5.5 is not widely
>> implemented (yet), I've finally managed to write down how multihoming
>> on PA address space could be done now in *some* cases:
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-linkova-v6ops-conditional-ras-00
>>
>> Comments are highly appreciated.
>>
>> P.S. It's '00' version, far from being perfect, I'll keep polish it
>> and -01 will be submitted before the IETF99 deadline.
>> --
>> SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
> 
> 
>