IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] SLAAC host moving between networks

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 02:34 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0FD12785F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 18:34:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gz6lKFAfmuXl for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 18:34:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A12126CB6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 18:34:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id d18so5108198qto.8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 18:34:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=x44fTUChV2j9FsdwQmEdsc/zCVlgNWOuNG0jpt4p0aE=; b=WOfLEAQBmJ+fBHQV6ffA10BMv9Sgjb9k+yBQXgH5N1VzkRFkxpjhxyPvhfkQXDfNN+ 2th9E72rSF8ejMTF5/IZNKRBxk45hcQh9pOW8LaJd1RkSLlnZ5SsbTJqPidgvtCKLlB1 A5sPghPnqngs1e+mXPrubISy+rjuZNGXt0173uNw48q8jJzZX51zVFij6BlDb2zCsWzi 7Ap9wZE50KHyMz4Ya0lwIPmYzNVlXr9100dSkxklATKNvv6wnt/5aU1XLeXdjafF+a2p sDg8dcK487Kgu7KCk9q3fT3/Md0Tg79KJCUjq8FQ4gD5jhAyhpTLlIjnegymLbxGc/Uf Nb+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=x44fTUChV2j9FsdwQmEdsc/zCVlgNWOuNG0jpt4p0aE=; b=FzyxKXVKQPqvvYgtgvsAHJJEPHvt7CuvqPVQc5QMvMS+YSpj7jTkWSUsnw5FWTruaZ i6Re6CSYjhPn6p8mwabVLlHmRGzcz8PB/G+0MpaYYsAJ0neUY1Wd/r72+H07RCmqR2Cl Xbe+FMBcqJQRYhw5HK81iHhF8hmm1XkqbsQfNAHTbyPWyCoVnseGsQdIGTlhQYcm3OvZ SDuSAW+Yu0Unj07g42bcFAVrN/n71ZNtvpbcyQ+53drxZaU06jn7Pb1ERecn05nO/TzE 67m4JBRq3PmqNiFWhMEq5wT6lVdwnNw6qM2A4kYvObxSv1mwvCh9vl5+2IRuz6b2o0lG ku3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gI+s3yVtrDIXfNF10B0G+Oh+3Xp6xvvpEDzrktQaHf7F2FCzWOc UNakP//oVgAC1qN/qDICItmgG2ZX1gHQWhctkv0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5ci3w1nJCOHAM4fGlDA8Fx7T8EQDrANKNh9rokUtx/Y8EOkic50yf2APXjA1LXARWcIp1YxL81MA4Ewi1f1A3U=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d8b4:: with SMTP id q49mr39287qvj.137.1541558086706; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 18:34:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181106113438.ud37g6ht6vaxtbif@imap.narrans.de> <CAO42Z2xkqWenu_9N6TK87DMBO3Dr9SrrLU=aDn8nL5sce+LWfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2xkqWenu_9N6TK87DMBO3Dr9SrrLU=aDn8nL5sce+LWfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 13:34:34 +1100
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAQaWQnQvO7RS54E+pdQWMjjq+qo3MN_=PoJD5ccUByM_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: florian@openbsd.org, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/E2vWhuQQ3tOzYiOLKMgHddEmLpI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC host moving between networks
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 02:34:52 -0000

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:44 AM Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought I'd read in an RFC somewhere that the one of the factors in
> source address selection was the value of the preferred lifetime of an
> address, so addresses with greater value preferred or valid lifetimes
> would be preferred as a tie breaker.
>
> However, I can't seem to remember which RFC, so maybe I just thought
> it would be that way and then an implementation I looked at worked
> that way.

It wasn't an RFC, it was my draft:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-linkova-6man-default-addr-selection-update-00

It expired because nobody seems to be interested in implementing this.
If we can have an implementation I'd be more than happy to revive the
document.

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email