IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Submitter Authentication for draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp

Roque Gagliano <rogaglia@cisco.com> Thu, 27 May 2010 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA8C3A69D3 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2010 00:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.219
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fXCZmIz8biW5 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2010 00:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E623A69B8 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 00:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OHXnt-0003xM-Kk for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Thu, 27 May 2010 07:46:57 +0000
Received: from [144.254.224.141] (helo=ams-iport-2.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <rogaglia@cisco.com>) id 1OHXnp-0003wh-L5 for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 07:46:54 +0000
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-Files: smime.p7s : 3815
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjICAI/A/UuQ/uCWe2dsb2JhbACeGBUBARYiBhylUZoghRME
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.53,310,1272844800"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="7878480"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 May 2010 07:07:45 +0000
Received: from dhcp-144-254-20-249.cisco.com (dhcp-144-254-20-249.cisco.com [144.254.20.249]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4R7kjww014339; Thu, 27 May 2010 07:46:45 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by dhcp-144-254-20-249.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Thu, 27 May 2010 09:46:50 +0200
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by dhcp-144-254-20-249.cisco.com on Thu, 27 May 2010 09:46:50 +0200
Subject: Re: I-D Submitter Authentication for draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
From: Roque Gagliano <rogaglia@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikyYfeexE4SSfry6eAl8Rq_tTafNGyWC_j9Bz7D@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:46:44 +0200
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Message-Id: <34BD2275-9815-4FC9-B8FA-D089DF233EB1@cisco.com>
References: <20100520125102.7E1593A6992@core3.amsl.com> <78D1E37F-3A05-4C3A-AF0A-4E2677E3E912@cisco.com> <AANLkTikyYfeexE4SSfry6eAl8Rq_tTafNGyWC_j9Bz7D@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eduardo Ascenço Reis <eduardo@intron.com.br>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-3-286461244"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

Hi Eduardo,

Thanks for your comment. I believe there is no difference and reflect what IXP do also in IPv4. 

Regards,

Roque

On May 27, 2010, at 12:08 AM, Eduardo Ascenço Reis wrote:

> Hi Roque,
> 
> Could you please highlight which differences that you understand to
> exist between IPv4 and IPv6 regarding IXP LANs routing options
> described in the following section?
> 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3.  Addressing Plan
> (...)
> When considering the routing of
>   the IXP LANs two options are identified:
> 
> o  IXPs may decide that LANs should not to be globally routed in
> (...)
> o  IXP may decide that LANs should (attempt to be) be globall routed.
> (...)
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> 
> Eduardo Ascenço Reis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email