Re: [v6ops] next steps with draft-palet-v6ops-p2p-from-customer-prefix

Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> Thu, 16 November 2017 05:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lee@asgard.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141F91294DB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:58:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQydNAQQX0NA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:58:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atl4mhob07.registeredsite.com (atl4mhob07.registeredsite.com [209.17.115.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C71A2129510 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:58:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.209]) by atl4mhob07.registeredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id vAG5wZ2a004893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:58:35 -0500
Received: (qmail 6838 invoked by uid 0); 16 Nov 2017 05:58:35 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 31.133.128.134
X-Authenticated-UID: lee@asgard.org
Received: from unknown (HELO ?31.133.128.134?) (lee@asgard.org@31.133.128.134) by 0 with ESMTPA; 16 Nov 2017 05:58:34 -0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.2.170228
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:58:24 +0800
From: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
CC: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <D633490C.8C246%lee@asgard.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] next steps with draft-palet-v6ops-p2p-from-customer-prefix
References: <3546393F-6BDB-4E22-BC7D-60F114C0783E@consulintel.es> <CAKD1Yr2pFnCnAQnY6eGpGi9ux25kK8w5BCZjZeRw8euzzG36_A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr2pFnCnAQnY6eGpGi9ux25kK8w5BCZjZeRw8euzzG36_A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3593685511_12459349"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/FKfgRWjHfvLWA03mu-gjq8r6PuY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] next steps with draft-palet-v6ops-p2p-from-customer-prefix
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 05:58:45 -0000


From:  v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Lorenzo Colitti
<lorenzo@google.com>
Date:  Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 1:38 PM
To:  Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc:  "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject:  Re: [v6ops] next steps with
draft-palet-v6ops-p2p-from-customer-prefix

> One difference between "this way" and the other ways is that at this point,
> the other ways are well-understood, but as far as I can tell, this way is
> undefined and undocumented.

Is that an objection or a statement of support? The path from “undocumented”
to “documented” is a document.

v6ops is specifically chartered to document IPv6 operational experience.
Sounds relevant.

Lee


> 
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:34 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
>> Again, regarding this document, my understanding is that the WG will prefer
>> instead of documenting just this way of doing point-2-point links, the
>> several options available, pros and cons and how.
>> 
>> Is that correct?
>> 
>> Anyone volunteering to co-author it?
>> 
>> I think I will be able to have a new version around end of this month.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Jordi
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> **********************************************
>> IPv4 is over
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> http://www.consulintel.es
>> The IPv6 Company
>> 
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
>> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
>> individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
>> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
>> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
>> considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
>> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
>> prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
>> original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops