IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Draft use cases for ULA

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 20 January 2023 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F91C14CE2B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:27:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gMc5BPFLK9Ah for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1415C14F74A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id z9-20020a17090a468900b00226b6e7aeeaso3618131pjf.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:27:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OXj3mjLEd0IQzFekSLVIIsw+coYg3PM4eQWLYS6uqmA=; b=ogFHjOTBonivL8dwLAoUBUEZZ5zN0fNFgDl6JOeyaYTSCPSYL5WhYq/B1KS1n5XZZn 3HhXLmXHPxWB2eBXPzFZIgjHScHX/uT3cyBB2R3hKE2/DYCIcuaaT2yBKNaiDXFF/RSR ePRHWYAG/VNX/ljwrrsTumMIVxT/kGt2v6shi1auI80B5WdGKEXTi1MIsu2lBsSaUiAt ZKawZ9XYXyVHHnkQnj/N9Py8JkHqILR+179gwtXqqRwSA/q3aY7bkgx4SIqnu/ruSKJJ iWcBEvGSvdBN42nMskXEX1jkE7pNDYrp1PnPQjrMzXhDm4sqJjakzVPgLKrGQm53Yvx5 2RnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OXj3mjLEd0IQzFekSLVIIsw+coYg3PM4eQWLYS6uqmA=; b=F4S5/mND36Lw/oHjVg2vjfwS31YFIJWzcNC3h94UYLth+wKlg4JFnsGlByDKT/S3pZ 0QewYKcVvii4gIUkc971bTLsjzDFPwnPdGEGC5SX+w2aG56jBJYrqx2p8BPZTFrHNu3O BzPaO48+cQNqRZkds5b+QFt1nBq2wY4mFyPnSeujyL9+F3YaCO4vtO2uXD2QYQRagtAo FlK7Fh8Lx4J1RrbMjonNfGietFzBKYdoOUQkF78s06afXNdqJ6P80jjQcjq71UleExCC ZpyjNKprIg2Iyt0DnD4DyUEN0NAlrzMbJhiD/zYmZkZJogFWBVdD0Hj6C3PY/fFZqEmi KanA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2koHBnZ8Bnrid79EQC1orvxADFqAyE7Xg3wvybfEKPDWBACRVPZE GvBe3e5zd77VJBeGJ8dg9c+h778aUpf1lg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtpIccmIbv6uDxq00zjIQjzTjS5MrY1YS7VXw57P/tjfdcLuv6olXs8NADQxcY8p++eS/+iNQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:280c:b0:229:8c:9e30 with SMTP id qb12-20020a17090b280c00b00229008c9e30mr14424290pjb.25.1674181624305; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPV6:2406:e003:10c2:2501:6969:5efe:7979:3937? ([2406:e003:10c2:2501:6969:5efe:7979:3937]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z17-20020a17090abd9100b00219752c8ea5sm319813pjr.37.2023.01.19.18.27.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:27:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b9c8cf36-f9bb-b78b-dca8-b55f1afda6ba@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 15:27:00 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <CAGB08_cYeDvRcckX0xGm696HAyughHRw40H1WQogm_t8D+opmg@mail.gmail.com> <845B5748-6D25-4CBA-A5E7-B31052F4BED7@employees.org> <CAGB08_ej5fi7E0rTY7q1x+MjTj_-rYm44U9eMnZQvJrr5Je=+w@mail.gmail.com> <0BE35D67-8D35-4BB5-8471-20CC734C029D@employees.org> <CAGB08_dLn4jmuSdT6AYYDdx3_n5qBVFKxBxAKi-0WEONbainiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGB08_dLn4jmuSdT6AYYDdx3_n5qBVFKxBxAKi-0WEONbainiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/FuBoDuHcNt_2J5xEvxDAqHSCze4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Draft use cases for ULA
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 02:27:08 -0000

I'd advocate reviving and revising content from draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-05 in the light of experience. We have a very detailed use case standardized in RFC8994, for example.

Regards
    Brian

On 20-Jan-23 01:11, Nick Buraglio wrote:
> Makes sense. That draft is pretty comprehensive, and outlines many of the issues that should make it obvious that ULA is a niche and not an analog for 1918.
> ᐧ
> 
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:12 AM Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org <mailto:otroan@employees.org>> wrote:
> 
>      >
>      > Well, not sure how I overlooked that glaringly obvious example. Such is life - Any reason that never went further? It seems quite comprehensive given a quick read.
> 
>     General animosity against ULA.
>     Every idea has its time. It might be that ULA is more acceptable now. When it is more examples of how tricky it is to expose end-sites to global addressing.
> 
>     O.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email