IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draIn ft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices WGLC

"Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com> Fri, 10 April 2015 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mackermann@bcbsm.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3A81B29EF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wKhQB8uKoQeO for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.z120.zixworks.com (mx.z120.zixworks.com [199.30.235.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42EA91B29E5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1]) by Outbound.z120.zixworks.com (Proprietary) with SMTP id 3FF6F2820DE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:11:55 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from imsva2.bcbsm.com (unknown [12.107.172.81]) by mx.z120.zixworks.com (Proprietary) with SMTP id A85922820A1; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:11:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from imsva2.bcbsm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA80 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D9D2F5269; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:08:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PWN401EA110.ent.corp.bcbsm.com (unknown [10.64.80.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imsva2.bcbsm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C91C2F523F; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:08:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PWN401EA160.ent.corp.bcbsm.com ([fe80::fdcb:603d:469e:b1db]) by PWN401EA110.ent.corp.bcbsm.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:11:52 -0400
From: "Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>, Philip Matthews <philip_matthews@magma.ca>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draIn ft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices WGLC
Thread-Index: AdBwejVZflkIuUqSRyO7yHiQggoOUQBQBUQAADGQMIAAFEHyUAAKlbwAAAe2V4AAA8flgAADhMYAABpqfEAADADhAAAF+U9g
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:11:42 +0000
Message-ID: <4FC37E442D05A748896589E468752CAA0CDB10E8@PWN401EA160.ent.corp.bcbsm.com>
References: <5526E8AD.2090201@foobar.org> <1314031813.3838791.1428619338706.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <4FC37E442D05A748896589E468752CAA0CDB0F11@PWN401EA160.ent.corp.bcbsm.com> <5528021E.3010500@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <5528021E.3010500@foobar.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.10.35]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-VPM-HOST: vmvpm02.z120.zixworks.com
X-VPM-GROUP-ID: 114c3ee0-8ec5-4bb3-bd96-0bb240f5f161
X-VPM-MSG-ID: 61a377b1-1c03-40cd-84b8-fa6d84fb7e3c
X-VPM-ENC-REGIME: Plaintext
X-VPM-CERT-FLAG: 0
X-VPM-IS-HYBRID: 0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/G4ceFDP7KBAox8IerT5JTkELBxs>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draIn ft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:11:58 -0000

I do not see any advantage in a BGP environment.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick@foobar.org] 
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 1:02 PM
To: Ackermann, Michael; Mark ZZZ Smith; Philip Matthews; Fred Baker (fred)
Cc: v6ops list
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draIn ft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices WGLC

On 10/04/2015 16:42, Ackermann, Michael wrote:
> It seems that the advice to use Link Locals for next hop (or maybe 
> even to use them at all?),  is situationally dependent.

Can you provide some concrete examples of where LLs are more appropriate than GUAs for BGP NH, and why?  I'm genuinely struggling to see any advantage.

Nick


The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies.
 
 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status