[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6tran-framework - where to go from here
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 11 January 2011 08:35 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC643A6A1D for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:35:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fCUIwNgPmzcN for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:35:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5AE3A6A1B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:35:44 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtYFAD+lK02rR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACWJo4Qc6I/mHSFTASEaIYmgyA
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2011 08:38:01 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com [10.32.244.218]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0B8bBG1013752 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:38:01 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:38:01 -0800
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com on Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:38:01 -0800
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:38:00 -0800
Message-Id: <21C4C296-601B-4E11-A629-0EE87C8F9018@cisco.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6tran-framework - where to go from here
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:35:45 -0000
Another question for the assembled throng: What do people want to see happen in draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6tran-framework? This came out of the v4v6tran effort. There seemed to be a fair support for the draft. What needs to happen with it? Comments to the list, please.
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6tran-framework -… Brian E Carpenter
- [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6tran-framework - whe… Fred Baker