Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-04.txt

Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> Thu, 28 June 2012 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE10121F85AA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.182, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p6s3bXYI4wz2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp21.services.sfr.fr (smtp21.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A209F21F8539 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2117.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id ECF5C7000054; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:22:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (per92-10-88-166-221-144.fbx.proxad.net [88.166.221.144]) by msfrf2117.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2569570000A7; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:22:18 +0200 (CEST)
X-SFR-UUID: 20120628142219153.2569570000A7@msfrf2117.sfr.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120626235329kawashimam@mail.jp.nec.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:22:18 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D1AA6A36-3589-4115-B546-2F106535703C@laposte.net>
References: <79510968-0EE0-473F-A0B1-DD4B35092523@laposte.net> <20120626235329kawashimam@mail.jp.nec.com>
To: Masanobu Kawashima <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-04.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:22:23 -0000

Le 2012-06-26 à 16:53, Masanobu Kawashima a écrit :

> 
> Hi Remi,
> 
> I'm sorry for late reply.
> 
> 464XLAT authors don't stick to the document category.

OK, thanks.

> If the chairs request changing the category, we will follow
> their opinion as we did before.

The question is then, are the chairs opposed to the draft being published as experimental?
Hope they will be open, so that we finish this thread.

Regards,
RD


> 
> Regards,
> Masanobu
> 
> 
>> Hi, Masanobu-san,
>> 
>> I have to confirm, no surprise, that I object to its BCP status because:
>> - it proposes more than just a combination of existing RFCs
>> - it has close relationship with subjects discussed in Softwires such as MAP and 4rd, without serious examination of this relationship.
>> 
>> OTOH, I also confirm that I would be pleased to support it if its status is changed back to Informational (its original status) because:
>> - It deals with a subject not covered by existing RFCs
>> - It is based on ideas that have been, at least in part, tested in the field.
>> - Issues raised in the WG (other than the RFC status) have been dealt with.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> RD
>> 
>> 
>> Le 2012-06-25 02:33, Masanobu Kawashima a rit :
>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> We have published draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-04.
>>> Can we move forward to WGLC?
>>> 
>>> Changes are:
>>> 
>>> - adding in the "Terminology" of CLAT that the CLAT does not
>>>  comply with "Both IPv4-translatable IPv6 addresses and
>>>  IPv4-converted IPv6 addresses SHOULD use the same prefix."
>>>  that is described on Section 3.3 in RFC 6052.
>>> 
>>> - splitting text of "using NAT44 and stateless XLATE on CLAT"
>>>  and "using only stateless XLATE on CLAT" in the section of
>>>  "IPv4/IPv6 Address Translation Chart" and "IPv6 Prefix
>>>  Handling" instead of deleting the section of "Relationship
>>>  between CLAT and NAT44"
>>> 
>>> - adding the combination with BIH [RFC6535] in the section of
>>>  "Introduction" and "Deployment Considerations".
>>> 
>>> - adding explanations about the diagram in the section of
>>>  "Network Architecture".
>>> 
>>> - adding the section of "Appendix A.  Examples of IPv4/IPv6
>>>  Address Translation".
>>> 
>>> - deleting marketing and commercial phrases (JPIX trial service).
>>> 
>>> All comments are welcome.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Masanobu
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>>> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF.
>>>> 
>>>> 	Title           : 464XLAT: Combination of Stateful and Stateless Translation
>>>> 	Author(s)       : Masataka Mawatari
>>>>                        Masanobu Kawashima
>>>>                        Cameron Byrne
>>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-04.txt
>>>> 	Pages           : 18
>>>> 	Date            : 2012-06-24
>>>> 
>>>> Abstract:
>>>> This document describes an architecture (464XLAT) for providing
>>>> limited IPv4 connectivity across an IPv6-only network by combining
>>>> existing and well-known stateful protocol translation RFC 6146 in the
>>>> core and stateless protocol translation RFC 6145 at the edge. 464XLAT
>>>> is a simple and scalable technique to quickly deploy limited IPv4
>>>> access service to IPv6-only edge networks without encapsulation.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat
>>>> 
>>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-04
>>>> 
>>>> A diff from previous version is available at:
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-04
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> v6ops mailing list
>>>> v6ops@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>> 
> 
> ========================================
> NEC AccessTechnica, Ltd.               
> Product Development Department         
> Masanobu Kawashima                     
> kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com               
> http://www.necat.co.jp/                
> ========================================
>