IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem - work or abandon?

"Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com> Mon, 02 November 2015 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA751B48FA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:00:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IRzrdcnAEj8P for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38EC61B48F4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BZV31671; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:00:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:00:48 +0000
Received: from NKGEML506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.20]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:00:44 +0800
From: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
To: 'IPv6 Operations' <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem - work or abandon?
Thread-Index: AQHRFU888nRMMUSjWUC3GmDThnGDmJ6I4jeA
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:00:43 +0000
Message-ID: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2319201@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <D25D591E.C914D%Lee.Howard@twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <D25D591E.C914D%Lee.Howard@twcable.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.194.186.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.563788B1.014F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.20, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 2c33d546c1ef9c8af9cd30af5348bbef
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/INwR5M4lcDXtXRPTmcDz_SINMXo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:00:53 -0000

Hi Dear all,

Speaking as a co-author. I do wish to continue working on it.

We actually had an essential revision around ietf93. We added more comprehensive test cases in that revision, but unfortunately we didn't get a chance to present it in Prague.
Personally I believe the technical aspect of the draft is ready, but might need a final editorial/organization revision.

And please pardon me for iterating it again: this draft is not intended to serve as a formal Problem Statement document, it is an informational draft that captures current divergent behaviors of interpreting the M/O bits by different operating systems. We believe it is valuable information for network administrators.

I really hope you could state your opinion if you're in favor of advancing the draft.

Best regards,
Bing 

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Howard, Lee
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 6:17 PM
To: 'IPv6 Operations'
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem - work or abandon?

This document hasn¹t had any revisions or discussion in a while.
Is there anyone interested in working on it?

If we do not hear any interest, we will abandon this draft.

Thanks,
Lee


________________________________

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email