[v6ops] general topic of ipv4 vs ipv6 preference
Ed Jankiewicz <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com> Tue, 09 November 2010 09:05 UTC
Return-Path: <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3839E3A69B8 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 01:05:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.788
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.257, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id THJkIMZHCjSl for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 01:04:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.sri.com (mail1.SRI.COM [128.18.30.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D043A68CE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 01:04:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_exYhufJIp5ScUmN+yJ9JXg)"
Received: from [130.129.64.180] ([unknown] [130.129.64.180]) by mail.sri.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0LBM00KOQ18VPGL0@mail.sri.com> for v6ops@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 01:05:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <4CD90ED2.60302@sri.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:05:22 +0800
From: Ed Jankiewicz <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: [v6ops] general topic of ipv4 vs ipv6 preference
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:05:01 -0000
reviewing drafts for tomorrow strikes me that several touch on the
general issue of how a host should determine whether to use IPv4 versus
IPv6 when both are available. I might suggest juggling the agenda a
little, grouping them and having a short general discussion on which if
any of these are appropriate to adopt as WG items, or perhaps combining
some drafts? Plus or minus I miss the point on any of these drafts...
sorry for the late suggestion, but better than saving it for 9:00am.
Regardless, we should consider the interaction or synergy of these
proposals.
1 *Happy Eyeballs: Trending Towards Success with Dual-Stack Hosts*
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-ipv6>
25-Oct-10, <draft-wing-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-ipv6-01.txt>
2 *Opening TCP Sessions in Complex Environments*
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-v6ops-session-start-time>
18-Oct-10, <draft-baker-v6ops-session-start-time-01.txt>
5 *Advanced Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers*
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis>
25-Oct-10, <draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-04.txt>
6 *CPE Considerations in IPv6 Deployments*
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements>
18-Oct-10, <draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00.txt>
7 *Network signaling for IPv4/IPv6 protocol selection for end-systems*
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vandevelde-v6ops-pref-ps>
16-Aug-10, <draft-vandevelde-v6ops-pref-ps-00.txt>
- [v6ops] general topic of ipv4 vs ipv6 preference Ed Jankiewicz