Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-09.txt
David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Fri, 12 December 2014 18:49 UTC
Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36811A0451 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:49:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id acy4Ctl_d_Jw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs-a.tc.umn.edu (vs-a.tc.umn.edu [134.84.119.220]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EE01A00B7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by vs-a.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:49:01 -0600 (CST)
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175] #+LO+TS+TR
X-Umn-Classification: local
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x19so7482876ier.20 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:49:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fG1VH/ZB4T/xxHY16Q78LyYMJIhBJ6KvA2lOgHCAvGg=; b=kLAJtaMBr70PdJHTU6S0wCZuS9Z93lD74SqwsMlyg6tdewNw1Zv61DCC/fDlQ056wn TPUV8q89elsSVaU3JQaJuwdUnKLsdwfayHXyi7i2b5fwIp4zY7dFxb+3F8GGHoYlTMBv SKwjccZ0RVfHQCjz6TcyqfVHGH+wC3cfFjY0I=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fG1VH/ZB4T/xxHY16Q78LyYMJIhBJ6KvA2lOgHCAvGg=; b=GVZ/Qbjs6Y6lZgI0pUaoGhKOtLp1F5aV8OBMszpsQY/WDhNdY0nfQd7hIg48iSbkpC 5sT58aQwgh/fgJvPQzWut/6RWabA4kEJ9hPjiF84aJrrrIPBZZsym1fw+ToT8sFubPHO nZAUeEF5IbFWZ5f/q5AurTpob1MnQyU1kPrxZ5FGIKbRhKgtyJFkUMoO54aoV1jK2kak oqbBFLSJqww5xt9wi5vWvECOgAsFjXnyLzNnSXv6PyCeiXBKit67Rq9fL07L8BZ9O7OJ i1W3EvgXnkUa2DFSx97vgHoUAcmVoZ3UNwLjLwcDjHAnTdM9bs/EnFKU9yXBOfSBWHi7 DTlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnGcqjX2s1jn0DuwXXijNZDjltbEnJiyBWtED+sxpM4sdHjqWDZJfubGBZnhEgamYKNzD/IW0JwbS9jyAg6GMfpfNMwifgPS3ERyogmcCKE55Q42hl0m7a0yxumOzN2lPEmRt1D
X-Received: by 10.107.158.11 with SMTP id h11mr17305513ioe.37.1418410140599; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:49:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.107.158.11 with SMTP id h11mr17305493ioe.37.1418410140433; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:49:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x-134-84-88-69.nts.umn.edu ([2607:ea00:101:2001:bcca:e006:e194:ea2d]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm993998iod.25.2014.12.12.10.48.58 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:48:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <548B3899.5080805@umn.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:48:57 -0600
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Organization: University of Minnesota
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <20141210185053.32277.17868.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5488977E.3010007@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5488977E.3010007@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/J0dIfr9o4S6Dl_jeUx3jcIfvb3M
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-09.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:49:16 -0000
I support the changes made in this version, in particular the removal of the general recommendation to filter 192.88.99.0/24. However, people do filter 6to4 and the route for 192.88.99.0/24, and I don't think the issue can and should be ignored. I would prefer some discussion of when it is and is not appropriate to filter the route for 192.88.99.0/24. Filtering of 6to4 or even 192.88.99.0/24 as part of the deprecation of anycast 6to4 relays within Internet in general is most definitely NOT appropriate. However, the deprecation of anycast 6to4 relays combined with local security consideration seems like an appropriate reason to filter the route for 192.88.99.0/24 within an administrative domain. If such filtering is implemented, it is much preferred that native IPv6 is provided within the administrative domain in question and the security policy not impact another administrative domain's access to an anycast 6to4 relay. Personally, I'd prefer a more detailed discussion as outlined in the paragraph above. However, I would find adding a general reference to RFC 7123 or possibly a more specific reference to Section 3.4 of RFC 7123 in the security considerations section of the draft an acceptable alternative. Thanks. On 12/10/14, 12:57 , Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Hi, > > This version has been updated after re-reading the long thread generated > by the WGLC. The major change reflects the fact that there was > obviously no consensus for the recommendation to filter the anycast > route. The other changes reflect other points that came up in the > discussion. > > One extra comment. With the removal of the filtering recommendation, > there is (the editor believes) no substantive change to the guidelines > in RFC 6343, so "Updates: 6343" has been removed. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > On 11/12/2014 07:50, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers >> Authors : Ole Troan >> Brian Carpenter >> Filename : draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-09.txt >> Pages : 8 >> Date : 2014-12-10 >> >> Abstract: >> Experience with the "Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds >> (6to4)" IPv6 transition mechanism defined in RFC 3056 has shown that >> when used in its anycast mode, the mechanism is unsuitable for >> widespread deployment and use in the Internet. This document >> therefore requests that RFC 3068, "An Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay >> Routers", be made obsolete and moved to historic status. It also >> obsoletes RFC 6732 "6to4 Provider Managed Tunnels". It recommends >> that future products should not support 6to4 anycast and that >> existing deployments should be reviewed. This complements the >> guidelines in RFC 6343. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic/ >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-09 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-09 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> I-D-Announce mailing list >> I-D-Announce@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >> > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer@umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================
- [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-hist… internet-drafts
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-… Keith Moore
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-… Brian E Carpenter
- [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to… Keith Moore
- Re: [v6ops] stats on 6to4 use (was: Fwd: I-D Acti… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] stats on 6to4 use (was: Fwd: I-D Acti… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] stats on 6to4 use Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] stats on 6to4 use (was: Fwd: I-D Acti… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] stats on 6to4 use Jeroen Massar
- Re: [v6ops] stats on 6to4 use (was: Fwd: I-D Acti… Metzler, Dan J
- Re: [v6ops] stats on 6to4 use (was: Fwd: I-D Acti… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] stats on 6to4 use (was: Fwd: I-D Acti… Metzler, Dan J