IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-02: (with COMMENT)

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Thu, 15 October 2015 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC971B3240; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnZfLYHSMrwK; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BD701B3242; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCC838; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:59:30 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date :date:in-reply-to:from:from:subject:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1444917568; bh=BUuAMksv/2A+jsChBadYUdxGa9/ZfJX+xcifOy/hon4=; b=G PoCgsALA4jlPcQyqvOXsi+LE/rOrXtg5KVU5olcgYc4ENsVOCIKO79YK28jeXNab JfhpSFw84oX6shxC6GR56iat/zWgRe/xUI2/9F5d//af0KUCy/lfKGkOFX7KehL6 e+kt89SfdSBZwSe+P40e1KNokNdNr4EByjoW7vsN7c=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id CYily5yjcORB; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:59:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:8640:1::3c04:b1d8:9444:4243] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:8640:1:0:3c04:b1d8:9444:4243]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25B6037; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:59:28 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\))
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20151015134204.15626.94656.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:59:27 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4D242FE7-9830-4611-8480-3A8BDCD565A8@steffann.nl>
References: <20151015134204.15626.94656.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/JBDZojENvVmRiegK4pRfH3DfFvY>
Cc: fred.baker@cisco.com, v6ops@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:59:35 -0000

Hi Stephen,

> Op 15 okt. 2015, om 15:42 heeft Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> [...]
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat/
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 3.2.1: I don't quite get the last sentence, and it sounds
> a bit like it might be somewhat hacky - can you explain
> that some more to me? Thanks.

It just says that the ER could do (proxy-like?) ND to attract IPv6 traffic for the service addresses. As the ER is actually responsible for handling/translating traffic to those addresses it doesn't sound very hacky to me.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email