Agenda for 78th IETF

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 28 June 2010 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4A33A698B for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.806, BAYES_40=-0.185, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4CfXM0F6hN5b for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC2B3A68B5 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OT8G9-000NpL-IW for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 06:56:01 +0000
Received: from [171.71.176.71] (helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <fred@cisco.com>) id 1OT8G6-000NlB-L2 for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 06:55:58 +0000
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEACPkJ0yrR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACfLHGkGpkwhSQEg2Y
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,495,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="264228299"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2010 06:55:56 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com [10.32.244.218]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5S6tlZO014118 for <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 06:55:49 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:55:56 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com on Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:55:56 -0700
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Agenda for 78th IETF
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:55:41 -0700
Message-Id: <1769D24B-6110-4C3D-A44E-D3AB3A83E98A@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

I rather expected to get requests for

        draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-01.txt
        draft-nakibly-v6ops-tunnel-loops-02.txt
        draft-korhonen-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt
        draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn-01.txt

What I have is the following.

Those who want agenda time should please post drafts to support it and should let me know. We were in fact given two slots in the initial agenda. If things remain as they stand, I'll cut that back to one.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
> Date: June 24, 2010 5:33:31 AM PDT
> To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> Subject: Agenda call
> 
> Anyone who wants time, please drop me a note.
> 
> Note that the Secretariat and IESG are currently struggling with the agenda, and we may very well wind up with one slot instead of two. I want to give all the time needed for discussions we need to have, and not waste time arguing for the second slot if we won't actually use it. So I really need to know this week.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
> Date: June 24, 2010 7:19:46 AM PDT
> To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, "IPv6 Operations" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> Cc: "Ole Troan" <ot@cisco.com>, <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> Subject: RE: Agenda call
> 
> Ole, Tim and myself would like few minutes on the harmful tunnels work.
> It is to be re-submitted very soon.
> 
> G/
> 


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com>
> Date: June 24, 2010 5:51:55 AM PDT
> To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: Agenda call
> 
> 
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:09:06 -0700
> To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
> Conversation: Looking for v6ops agenda items
> Subject: Re: Looking for v6ops agenda items
> 
> 
> Hi Fred,
> 
> I would like 10 minutes please. Depending on the "agenda density", I could
> use 5 more minutes for Q&A.
> 
> draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-in-mobile-networks
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Rajeev
> 
Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
> Date: June 24, 2010 7:22:15 AM PDT
> To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
> Cc: "Tony Hain (ahain)" <ahain@cisco.com>, "Chip Popoviciu (cpopovic)" <cpopovic@cisco.com>
> Subject: RE: Agenda call
> 
> Hi Fred,
> 
> I would like to ask 10 minutes time to discuss "IP protocol
> selection"... its not a draft yet, but the idea is out there and I just
> have to write it down... should be done rather soon once I get to it.
> 
> G/
Begin forwarded message:

> From: <Jason.Weil@cox.com>
> Date: June 27, 2010 11:39:30 AM PDT
> To: <fred@cisco.com>
> Cc: <marla.azinger@frontiercorp.com>, <tli@cisco.com>
> Subject: RE: Agenda call
> 
> Fred,
> 
> Tony Li, Marla Azinger and I would like a few minutes to discuss a CIDR for IPv6 draft which is basically an update to RFC4632. It will be submitted to the list shortly. Either Marla or I will be in attendance to present.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason