Re: [v6ops] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-04: (with COMMENT)

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Thu, 15 October 2015 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72C31B2B77; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WfLM5yV1vE_R; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E473F1B2B76; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb.local ([IPv6:2601:647:4204:51:e8d8:3b7c:d0c0:9e49]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t9F5rJlV027914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 05:53:19 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20151014141627.7396.28624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <561F3F4E.1000609@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:53:18 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151014141627.7396.28624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vRAEVw6LbpskGtH2kMB8s308QKk01umNe"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/JmXlEWvBC0nB4ZfIPjCot30VzvY>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 05:53:23 -0000

On 10/14/15 7:16 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-04: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The following sentence int he Security Considerations section is hard to
> read, can you adjust it?
> 
>   The proxy replication results in devices not associated with the flow
>    that generated the PTB being recipients of an ICMPv6 message which
>    contains a fragment of a packet.

  The proxy replication results in devices on the subnet not associated
with the flow
  that generated the PTB, being recipients of the ICMPv6 PTB message; which
  contains a large fragment of the packet that exceeded the allowable MTU.

> 
>