Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6-01.txt

Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com> Thu, 02 February 2012 01:52 UTC

User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.0.0.100825
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:52:38 -0500
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CB4F546A.14A92%victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6-01.txt
In-Reply-To: <20120202014013.7595.76024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6-01.txt
Precedence: list

V6OPS WG,

An update has been posted which rolled up comments made to date.  This
version reflects the following:

- Focus on IPv6 enablement and deployment progression
- Tone around IPv4 has been muted somewhat in that it's noted, but again -
focus on IPv6
- Less focus on text around "IPv6 code immaturity" as it did not sit well
with many - focus here is on operational experience in IPv6 and lack of
maturity in operation networks

Points still in debate and/or require more discussion

- Test describing and including technologies outside of Dual Stack,
DS-Lite and 6RD.  Some have noted that inclusion of NAT46 (with relation
to NAT64) should be included.  Example would be
draft-mawatari-v6ops-464xlat-00.
- Regarding the above, we had originally intended to only include a set of
technologies which have commercial availability.  Would discussion of the
above be worth describing in document? (as actual text and/or just minor
reference?)

I will be looking for comments which support (or challenge) updates on the
recent -01 post, and the matter of including NAT46/NAT464 (as referenced
above).

Future update will include more information in the considerations portion
of the document as I have much input from folks who have deployment
experience information for some areas.

Regards,

Victor K



On 12-02-01 8:40 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
wrote:

>
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working
>Group of the IETF.
>
>    Title           : Wireline Incremental IPv6
>    Author(s)       : Victor Kuarsingh
>                          Lee Howard
>    Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6-01.txt
>    Pages           : 25
>    Date            : 2012-02-01
>
>   Operators worldwide are in various stages of preparing for, or
>   deploying IPv6 into their networks.  The operators often face
>   difficult challenges related to both IPv6 introduction along with
>   those related to IPv4 run out.  Operators will need to meet the
>   simultaneous needs of IPv6 connectivity and continue support for IPv4
>   connectivity for legacy devices with a depleting supply of IPv4
>   addresses.  The IPv6 transition will take most networks from an IPv4-
>   only environment to an IPv6 focused environment with long period of
>   dual stack operation varying by operator.  This document helps
>   provide a framework for Wireline providers who are faced with the
>   challenges of introducing IPv6 along meeting the legacy needs of IPv4
>   connectivity utilizing well defined and commercially available IPv6
>   transition technologies.
>
>
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-
>ipv6-01.txt
>
>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-i
>pv6-01.txt
>
>_______________________________________________
>v6ops mailing list
>v6ops@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

[v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-inc… internet-drafts
Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline… Victor Kuarsingh