Re: [v6ops] V6OPS WG Interim Meeting, September 29, 2012
"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 12 September 2012 17:07 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B6021F8623 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qr+GMrxMd-ns for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A476A21F861E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2102; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1347469653; x=1348679253; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=aOtHou33W81nJ9VnuP0EOb44zk8ap6SbDM5VQHchCyw=; b=WkIhDkUWSPLjOWN/EZJEFVq6LFpyfUMyD45ZIPBoY60q1YpdOu9FjXaa eZRxdroNADOMTdnhSKp3TD5JyANcvKG0N2VEsMrox4d490WuT0R0F5bGM jFcYZhSQro6oPjNblQGHI9flyDu9xpd1yjk+tp1KQz9L7nka2T6aqXx5K Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAFfAUFCtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABFu02BB4IgAQEBAwESASc/BQsCAQg2EDIlAgQODhmHZQYLm3qgL4sQGoVIYAOVX4EUjSKBaYJmgWM0
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,410,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="117871902"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2012 17:07:33 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8CH7X5c002802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:07:33 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.97]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:07:32 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] V6OPS WG Interim Meeting, September 29, 2012
Thread-Index: AQHNkQkYkmR6CoN1J0+I/v3jYW3eMg==
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:07:32 +0000
Message-ID: <E890B91F-A5D1-45A8-8ACD-417A776DBE6D@cisco.com>
References: <20120831160458.25436.40986.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120831160458.25436.40986.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.32.244.221]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19178.005
x-tm-as-result: No--33.839500-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3B29BA7660F2B34F9F9DC3827FB9605A@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] V6OPS WG Interim Meeting, September 29, 2012
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:07:34 -0000
On Aug 31, 2012, at 9:04 AM, IESG Secretary wrote: > I think we should plan to maintain an interim document submission > deadline two weeks out from the meeting itself. To be considered for > inclusion in the interim agenda new or revised documented should be > submitted to the IETF document system by 23:59 UTC on Sept 14th. This is what I have seen since IETF-84 to date. We have two more days for updated drafts for the construction of that agenda. At IETF-84, we discussed possibly discussing the following in the interim meeting: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 "Enterprise Incremental IPv6", KK Chittimaneni, Tim Chown, Lee Howard, Victor Kuarsingh, Yanick Pouffary, Eric Vyncke, 8-Aug-12 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lopez-v6ops-dc-ipv6 "A Reference Framework for DC Migration to IPv6", Zhonghua Chen, Diego Lopez, Tina Tsou, Cathy Zhou, 19-Jun-12 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-matthews-v6ops-design-guidelines "Design Guidelines for IPv6 Networks", Philip Matthews, 29-Jun-12 At this point, only *enterprise-incremental-ipv6 has been updated. active drafts updated since IETF 84: -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 35674 Aug 7 00:31 draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-experience-00.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 66223 Aug 7 18:32 draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 15230 Aug 17 02:10 draft-smith-v6ops-larger-ipv6-loopback-prefix-01.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 42778 Aug 19 22:59 draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-07.txt Finished WGLC, looking for further comments on -03 and on text proposed in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg14109.html: -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 60136 Aug 30 23:57 draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt In IESG: -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 49667 Aug 16 09:04 draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-10.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 12249 Sep 10 16:51 draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-06.txt In RFC Editor's queue: -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 71741 Sep 10 13:19 draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6-06.txt
- [v6ops] V6OPS WG Interim Meeting, September 29, 2… IESG Secretary
- Re: [v6ops] V6OPS WG Interim Meeting, September 2… Fred Baker (fred)