Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)

Adeel Sadiq <11beeasadiq@seecs.edu.pk> Wed, 01 June 2016 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <11beeasadiq@seecs.edu.pk>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA3312B007 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=seecs.edu.pk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5QSQbxir_UEi for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com (mail-yw0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 373B312D111 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id c127so16987485ywb.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 05:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seecs.edu.pk; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IusVzVGwFdkxwaa51efa4AIlwMbOZHbH+nou/NDz3iU=; b=aRLtdOGIcAogYh02UPtoBL40Q8dBTEL95MAVG3CCsAfbDfDHbQvfF6y+DOpaO7KArQ CdzhERJ8FpjMZRoH0pBWDxZd54zKRICMfNzN1T86KbWvPeQPApFNoqo0/5fcCPv9Ngay ziDca3qr/b5wn+0msq2y7BzeZUNdUPdGgveW4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IusVzVGwFdkxwaa51efa4AIlwMbOZHbH+nou/NDz3iU=; b=FbYzPdBn1b0Wpb3cFfqgN6YfEDmY2TlOhaeGjZMEhvWyYZt3QNjz0x9kJeOy5NS0ew Ti8v3/BagFTjxJmdk+5SY5B78bSM8D4W5Yf3Otpxw5benuYeRlkzGrJDXFsHvZChJp3w ot6QF3gSJmjULu91ToIdqPi2eeQVKYC4T+5xj3Xv3Ta/fxa87bwx4MfmEoiIK0ALs9E2 8JUX/i4kVcanpX4HuFY4lVIUTS6Vpye3/5bZsm4UWWt2ZhFvAQelfjwJxFHynI57lq6d IHfrs7qGu2Pxxyxf5kt4yG91U/UQlJIaRzzjxzYlSXgeFLbCAq4PhF81V9OrxHC+bimQ Y35A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLoUHDX4lQEbUeye93ICEXttfhkfXrN63anmnGAAIKNt7zBq+l1ym7dgG2Bf720m0aiJF1EUk//ymBZiCRV
X-Received: by 10.13.217.6 with SMTP id b6mr2072906ywe.307.1464785528423; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.83.46.18 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5099e169-696d-54ec-a4a7-8cc773e358c5@gmail.com>
References: <20160211191203.4120F180472@rfc-editor.org> <5099e169-696d-54ec-a4a7-8cc773e358c5@gmail.com>
From: Adeel Sadiq <11beeasadiq@seecs.edu.pk>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:51:49 +0500
Message-ID: <CALZOxwW0KUjNhk7_iHym1XhA8hirye=0831OMDC6GDYWmS54Cw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fc6f8182acf053436f5ac"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/LRnah7pIZhSCRMAxB1c6VNdL5gg>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:52:12 -0000

Dear Alexandre

Thank you for your concern.

I think we'll have to look into it by making different test scenarios, both
with IPv4 and IPv6. Like maybe we need less/more RAs when an IPv6-only
network needs to connect to IPv4-only network, or vice versa, or any
possible combination of the two.

Regards

Adeel Sadiq

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi v6ops,
>
> I wonder whether there may be interest in evaluating the energy
> consumption of an IPv6 application on smartphones, compared to its IPv4
> counterpart.
>
> I suspect the difference may be negligible but I am not sure.
>
> It would be good to avoid a situation in which the end user prefers IPv4
> on the smartphone because IPv6 empties the battery.
>
> Alex
>
> Le 11/02/2016 à 20:12, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org a écrit :
>
>> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>>
>>         BCP 202
>>         RFC 7772
>>
>>         Title:      Reducing Energy Consumption of Router
>>                     Advertisements
>>         Author:     A. Yourtchenko,
>>                     L. Colitti
>>         Status:     Best Current Practice
>>         Stream:     IETF
>>         Date:       February 2016
>>         Mailbox:    ayourtch@cisco.com,
>>                     lorenzo@google.com
>>         Pages:      6
>>         Characters: 12555
>>         See Also:   BCP 202
>>
>>         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-03.txt
>>
>>         URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7772
>>
>>         DOI:        http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7772
>>
>> Frequent Router Advertisement messages can severely impact host power
>> consumption.  This document recommends operational practices to avoid
>> such impact.
>>
>> This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the
>> IETF.
>>
>>
>> BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
>> Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
>> improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
>>
>> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>>   https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
>>
>> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
>> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
>>
>> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
>> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
>> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
>> unlimited distribution.
>>
>>
>> The RFC Editor Team
>> Association Management Solutions, LLC
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>