IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4)

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 08 July 2016 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C63D12D10B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 05:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPrmyjSf6EbG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 05:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6795312B062 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 05:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id u68CaTRl025412; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:36:29 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 170F2209065; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:36:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE49D209060; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:36:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id u68CaS3t020316; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:36:28 +0200
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, "Heatley, Nick" <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk>
References: <20160211191203.4120F180472@rfc-editor.org> <5099e169-696d-54ec-a4a7-8cc773e358c5@gmail.com> <4B8679AA-6FA4-4D9F-A7DD-C8DD6F525EC6@cisco.com> <5fcbf830-fc25-7394-5c8a-55dc9189b462@gmail.com> <CAMugd_V-=2woJZPQUSzDYacxZVSW-9H5S8x5Qx=VxNc5_iGerQ@mail.gmail.com> <093d3a00-a2cc-c6d9-8939-56114eb4a461@gih.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B2131714501A@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <20160603021720.15D9E4AA4453@rock.dv.isc.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4a5750c6-1dd3-9a78-d740-309ce71df45d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:36:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160603021720.15D9E4AA4453@rock.dv.isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/WNfYR7N3qmWC3vv-pX2L9mJXZ6s>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:36:36 -0000


Le 03/06/2016 à 04:17, Mark Andrews a écrit :
>
> While reducing power consumtion is a good thing, we will be wasting
> peoples time to compare IPv6 vs IPv4 power consumption.  Don't we
> have better things to do than to waste peoples time on the academic
> exercise which will produce nothing useful.

Measuring is useful only if it compares against something.  We think
comparing against IPv4 consumption has a meaning.

We advance towards producing something supposedly useful about measuring
energy consumption of IPv6 vs IPv4 apps on smartphones on WiFi and 4G.

If it proves unuseful we will report that as well.

Alex

>
> Mark
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email