Re: [v6ops] ND cache entries creation on first-hop routers

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 05 July 2019 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C161112012A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 02:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uarRgtTTxvB6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 02:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C2111200CE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 02:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x659YK9a043278; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:34:20 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CA75205B12; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:34:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0392B205B10; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:34:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x659YJiC020154; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:34:19 +0200
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <CAFU7BAQ4xrjNn9-EUyRhyHKDDT=f381Z4T6x6qJ=ftm2D2K4cw@mail.gmail.com> <162e470d-a1da-c100-3806-e4ab7640f5e2@gmail.com> <CAFU7BARdFSPX4S29_xVJnNBfdkocan89oSaROnOw9vctCu9m-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <cd0422bd-c3d9-842c-d979-9f4d7ab4167d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:34:19 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BARdFSPX4S29_xVJnNBfdkocan89oSaROnOw9vctCu9m-w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Nd1AInnvNvhD9K-moBifKe5WF4E>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] ND cache entries creation on first-hop routers
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 09:34:25 -0000

Hi Jen,

Le 05/07/2019 à 05:50, Jen Linkova a écrit :
> Hi Alexandre,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:49 PM Alexandre Petrescu 
> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am reading through this draft trying to identify whether the
>> indicated ND problem (router lacking ND entry for host's GUA makes
>> drop first incoming packet to GUA) happens on a ptp link like 4G,
>> or on a shared link like WiFi.
>> 
>> On what was it tried?
> 
> Well, I observed it on WiFi (I guess you should be able to see the 
> issue in Montreal).

It is good to know for WiFI.  Let me try on Ethernet.

>>> The router ND cache, however, might contain an entry for the
>>> device link-local address (if the device has been performing the
>>> ND process for the roiter LLA) but there are no entries for the
>>> device GUA.
>> 
>> But has the host DADed (sent NAs) when it formed its GUA?  I guess
>> that would be heard by router, to create that ND cache entry.
> 
> 1) Those NSes are sent from unspecified address 2) they are sent to
> the solicited node mcast address so routers might not even receive
> them.

Ah I see.  It's not NSs that are necessary, and worse, the routers that 
dont implement link scoped multicast on WiFi would not see them either.

But how about NA?

An NA was issued by my Ethernet adapter of my Windows 10 after I 
manually assigned fd00::1/65 on it; it was issued to a multicast 
address, informing all-nodes that it has that MAC address.  The Router 
receiving it would presumably associate that link-layer address to 
fd00::1/65.

I think that's how the GUA of Host is supposed to get its way in the NC 
of Router, probably.

Alex

>