IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Stateless NAT64

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Sun, 22 July 2012 05:31 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4353E11E808F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.496
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.103, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6T51ODaITb7G for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1FA11E808C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=442; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1342935170; x=1344144770; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=1WVKCdhFRX3P88PkcBhdeS+nrwdyvfO+kU2w/7Oh6DU=; b=QS5KfZsZRN8pAsGK2UrYnoCpxPV7BGoKJj1WRyPyjLF3TTCGH1EyvKYL zXZvg+VolgKO9ymuvDFGGJZHBMZZUyy+ukmUQ/n+V2vIU6wBoCpcMeLpz 0kyO5Fhsd4+FxltS1g8sgbYaWUqfYR6JrgZxXrKHCwPbJmVhCqUTvUY15 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EANCPC1CtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABFuV2BB4IgAQEBAwESASc/BQsCAQg2EDIlAgQOJ4dlBp8knwSLTYVzYAOVSY4ngWaCXw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,631,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="104133282"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2012 05:32:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6M5WnSP005050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:32:49 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.118]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 00:32:49 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "<sarikaya@ieee.org>" <sarikaya@ieee.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Stateless NAT64
Thread-Index: AQHNZ8ttnYI5ufwA3U6h5r7c96sc9g==
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:32:37 +0000
Message-ID: <D6E88CA4-1637-494A-8F54-9DF451A40F02@cisco.com>
References: <CAC8QAccq-uS7wshmt9_V=Fj0zQ3vy1+-CN6MmFwmvjCOG6aKMA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAccq-uS7wshmt9_V=Fj0zQ3vy1+-CN6MmFwmvjCOG6aKMA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.32.244.221]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19056.004
x-tm-as-result: No--28.468800-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B2260E8D71216148B6EEDB3C4C2959E6@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Aleksi Suhonen <Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi>, "<v6ops@ietf.org>" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02 Stateless NAT64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:31:52 -0000

On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

> So you need to write a draft describing Stateless NAT64 :-), please.

Stateless IPv4/IPv6 translation is RFC 6145.

Are you poking at the fact that only RFC 6146 claims the name "NAT64"?

If so, I'll point out that nobody claims the name "NAT46", although draft-ietf-pcp-base-26.txt and draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-03.txt attempt to refer to it.

Do the grep.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email