Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service
Edwin Cordeiro <edwin@scordeiro.net> Wed, 08 April 2015 07:41 UTC
Return-Path: <edwinsc@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957DF1B2DE5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41zoA-Vrseok for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E6A61B2D4A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by labbd9 with SMTP id bd9so48234505lab.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=FzRbEiV3PgDn7aoGvSsn9t7VYXQi7XoMkmA9gF47JgA=; b=HFJ3auPgbkVouTNSZLivd32YN4z2BkOlrByEVjR/be4aHDaVgC+TIqevPD5/qHveNS TUcsmPc4h9PpTBDttJhcaoKGrlStNnPRxNfP0jWJQUGfglRvj5l6mZ72vL96qbYyDTwa 2ghLdTtjrhdKAT+6mPCe74bHdJGTmp+HH2GC5YxxfK2b4epRAKsfhHrHMKYR62Oys4iZ JhNMvnHDoTMNDpAJPQMj00FRLEnDD4+8QpV2zr1WofnvtlvHnIBsqyYjkPrv8YiSOmCj iPnHkvOmvj3Gg/d2YyaAKXh0xvbIDOphxXRlqK9OzZOofWs21rKKd9RkE1mA1gnvChju qcsg==
X-Received: by 10.152.219.2 with SMTP id pk2mr21588186lac.107.1428478842603; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: edwinsc@gmail.com
Received: by 10.152.29.72 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BEE8225E-26E3-49E6-955F-B2939D07B702@cisco.com>
References: <D2204E54-FD09-40E1-A3BE-A662C4546E0D@cisco.com> <8EF27210-0C56-4F6D-81FD-B27EE34ED444@cisco.com> <CAHDzDLBNJVNL4B3R0HvWWTZ=P0kJihKrjRzkDN07LPV_t_QnLw@mail.gmail.com> <95C21895-305F-46BD-A571-925FBD838EEA@cisco.com> <940432F8-44CD-43E7-B570-D3CAA07C4710@cisco.com> <CA+4Y_jXZs4jebK20XJVp_JF1DyqS0LgK=HGr-23GZo_OAN4b8g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+4Y_jVjo=2wM0btY_67KBYR4pXgA9adcOOhn9k666iPiHF2wA@mail.gmail.com> <BEE8225E-26E3-49E6-955F-B2939D07B702@cisco.com>
From: Edwin Cordeiro <edwin@scordeiro.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:40:12 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: wW5CJTRLCKWcb1T1FqusOonN3BE
Message-ID: <CAERpkxDavT-cV62O=Oysga8bGqEg8mLd_Z0iv9SOypOoT1aEog@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134188cfb9023051331a5a2"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Orv8ZJy5tos9Mkp1YnJ8HTo_SEo>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 07:41:52 -0000
Dear Fred, I read your document and I have some material that might be useful in the "Observations and Experiments" part. On my Master thesis I compared DS-Lite, 464XLAT, MAP-E and MAP-T, the results are available at: http://edwin.scordeiro.net/master The dissertation text is in Portuguese, but there is a summary article in English available in the link as well. If you want, I may assist on your proposed task. Best regards, -- Edwin Cordeiro, M.Sc. Network Architectures and Services T: +49 89 289 18550 Department of Computer Science M: +49 175 215 6481 Technische Universität München On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote: > Since they might be among the early folks I would ask to write something, > I asked Xing Li, Akira, and Suprita to comment specifically on the outline: > “if you were to write such a document, how would this outline work for you”. > > Suprita replied as follows. I have changed the proposed outline in a > manner similar to her suggestion. > > On Mar 31, 2015, at 2:41 PM, suprita <suprita.nitw@gmail.com> wrote: > > I tried to first re-write the "Outlined hierarchy" used and then make any > modification to it, as per ease of answering them. > I did not have to do many changes to the one already used by you, with > minor adjustments in naming convention and placements.. > > Experience Gathering : Heading > > General/Overview > Major Motivation(s) > v4 as-a-service Requirements > Exactly which v4 Service Types > Architecture and Methodology > Major Design Considerations > Regulatory Considerations > Security Considerations > Operational Considerations > End-User Experience Considerations > Observations and Experiences > Effects on End-User > Effects on Internal Staff > Planning & Design > Implementation > Operations > Effects on Business > Summary: Post-mortem Report > Deviations from RFC's/Drafts/Standards > Worked Well > Did not work well > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:56 AM, suprita <suprita.nitw@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear Fred, >> >> I am yet to apply newly learnt skill from you of applying filters for the >> directly addressed e-mails :). >> I will sure go through the doc in detail and comment. >> >> Thank you, >> Suprita >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> > On Mar 30, 2015, at 12:50 PM, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Over the weekend, we crowd-sourced a number of pretty good questions. >>> I took the liberty, this morning, of reorganizing the text a bit. The "list >>> of technologies" and "list of questions" remain, but I have added "possible >>> (classes of) documents to be developed" and a first cut at a proposed >>> outline, with the questions from above pulled in to make it clear what I >>> might hope the section might comment on. >>> > >>> > Collecting comments and thoughts. I guarantee there is something we >>> haven’t thought of (as I was reorganizing, several points popped out, and >>> I’m sure I’m not that smart). >>> > >>> >> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ifDEkoypW43lgZJqh2paUDcMAwoUWdz6psyEb456c3A/edit?usp=sharing >>> >>> The first thing I am wondering about is whether the proposed outline >>> “works”. Would you be willing to spend an hour thinking through the outline >>> and wondering how you would respond to it for Reliance? What questions are >>> missing? Would another organization work better? >>> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > >
- [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Mukom Akong T.
- Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service Edwin Cordeiro