IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] small concern about CPE advanced requirements

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Fri, 04 March 2011 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44323A6818 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:05:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.533, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLSsyMEWg448 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:05:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22A23A6A15 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:05:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=shemant@cisco.com; l=1594; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1299265595; x=1300475195; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to; bh=S0y+XQzqRduyzj5sbb0yy7yQKkom1ny93bRixsPTKRA=; b=GkaEg9ATGU6oenFW2Ep1wNwbQlOriRGfuWULphqDOmrKBxRWLzyik3cK 38tr75rUUxKGVtv/NOmvmlOlJis0whe6FlWXs+YO/PrhQirvr6LwUgpPO WW0AgYlqNsUxzhRrmyhG+K5c1yTdZ3swxIiVqK69OeW2FoRTah4nAdmbJ g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq8AAHDGcE2tJV2c/2dsb2JhbACYJo49dKNem2SFYQSFHIpc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,265,1297036800"; d="scan'208";a="222679828"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2011 19:06:34 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com [72.163.62.200]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p24J6YL5010613; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:06:34 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-109.cisco.com ([72.163.62.151]) by xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:06:34 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:06:33 -0600
Message-ID: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3E2A27D@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C8FF7A11.2A47%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] small concern about CPE advanced requirements
Thread-Index: AQHLgHZJJ8j1dKMqzkm7Bkb6NtqtSpNqDBCAgLQwcHA=
References: <201011100126.oAA1QCNc011270@givry.fdupont.fr> <C8FF7A11.2A47%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>, v6ops@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2011 19:06:34.0829 (UTC) FILETIME=[47BB17D0:01CBDA9F]
Subject: Re: [v6ops] small concern about CPE advanced requirements
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:05:26 -0000

I am planning to submit a new copy of the CPE advanced requirements
document.  Please let me know if this new text works for you guys.

DLW-4:  If the IPv6 CE Router is configured with a IPv4 address within a
specific addressing range on its WAN interface the IPv6 CE Router MUST
disable the DS-Lite B4 element.  The specific addressing range is the
set of addresses specified in [RFC1918] and the well-known IPv4 address
specified in [I-D.ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite].

Thanks,

Hemant

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Lee, Yiu
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 10:22 PM
To: Francis Dupont; v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] small concern about CPE advanced requirements

Agreed.

On 11/9/10 8:26 PM, "Francis Dupont" <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> wrote:

>In draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-04.txt,
>'5.6.1.  Dual-Stack(DS)-Lite' page 9:
>
>   DLW-4:  If the IPv6 CE Router is configured with an non-RFC1918 IPv4
>           address on its WAN interface, the IPv6 CE Router MUST
disable
>           the DS-Lite B4 element.
>
>The 192.0.0.0/29 from draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite-06.txt
>'5.7.  Well-known IPv4 address' page 9 must be added to
>RFC 1918 addresses.
>
>Regards
>
>Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
>_______________________________________________
>v6ops mailing list
>v6ops@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email