Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00.txt
Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Tue, 05 March 2024 01:29 UTC
Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D769C1CAF36 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:29:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oJ4QEBKsC0Vw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:29:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 025ABC1CAF31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:29:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d24a727f78so62629611fa.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:29:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709602155; x=1710206955; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=oPz6TKVUlV3gK4M47OYwu3M9PBgl7r8wxesOwzFJStw=; b=OeFk5sTb/Tdbn+h9HM2v2x6OyPN3zH5rjisn2KljXzyI13Pmq4h8kEJi+FOs7qHzjk /1wrvCdy9M1Z/TOtPD1r5IZx7Uo+D3NiZ1RwMkksGl1lsPJIXxzhUmvj8WeA+ZYspXaL 6AYF4Ega/gsRA3bfvQE2WwAb2Ci0jUZGIXeMyNTZswIlGPMPVvzlCqDqsyFJk3J4HXGD vurFE4G8PcNd24uB8kW9rlhyxaJ2QVDQFHndgtq5RSeZe63RQuYx7ICOf7/s3oWmlPK/ t6ufiCL380gcCsvzXpv+GkaQ+dLkYxMss37Z962/Ki9hdIgn9ww2obRTdqMzBXDaa6qW NuuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709602155; x=1710206955; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oPz6TKVUlV3gK4M47OYwu3M9PBgl7r8wxesOwzFJStw=; b=LNDPVl/dBA3sjWcHl+avmqjz/SXUXLFLV39BzvfnWLGCs/7w0pn+GHtvheKjs1XL5B +Ob9DtX3ji4yAtFCJNQ0JlcXB8ryc42teCuoUhzjy4ZEa/AhEqSClte6Oml7+arPNUum l3U99Y47hWIEcOZojwHSYewnMBIZJY7ojM2jqM8zAy+lYhNg738Mdulhhne+RJxmJIve zCnvyMYRjay1nre7S9PPdxTqmYlNGDDMEgbVtzZ5EfNgx/QMx/P2V5HyIFMYpDkfeYid jHCUbbpVTcWf2QMKIFjVkhGQzhV3rDEUyq1X2cLuS/E9siedbzJZNbFKd1yNtpGWDPph TQAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxBGYq55mjkhP5lGJxdUAtHckgcTcyXXpy5bpDAcYCnUq6ONA61 O2pnV/ruft0trk+AoZLhu7vRDPAjv2+DQPC84byvy8WbfKY8USq4/BZXudOSmGEBc+UGb/ZocaK 3mJa9sExm5EE8ZdEr10fAirtGFqY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF/WJInwdshzfnATA9Gb6aeFllMuHrxQlK7M5Y/1qe5WP7362Xv8ztaHJ/8O6oRhwHYrpxqWVceqLrhrHoH+JM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:10a9:b0:2d2:284d:3ae5 with SMTP id k9-20020a05651c10a900b002d2284d3ae5mr273947ljn.45.1709602154479; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:29:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170955522053.39685.10398176610934575947@ietfa.amsl.com> <d5cfd59b-6657-a212-66b4-5c907ee2a5b7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d5cfd59b-6657-a212-66b4-5c907ee2a5b7@gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 12:29:02 +1100
Message-ID: <CAFU7BARE6_ZDngaN5J4z4hUakFx+=6PUViS79dHByaSOgHmfdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QFqm7Qi5WswrzhU4J9a-N-tgmH8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 01:29:19 -0000
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 12:17 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > This draft is an excellent start. Thank you! > The security considerations seem a bit short. It's a side effect of the draft submission deadline ;) Will be fixed in -01 ;) > > This document does not introduce any privacy considerations > > Are we sure about that? For example, some people (not me) will claim > that the privacy benefits of NAT are lost for the IPv6-only hosts. If we compare the proposed design with a dual-stack approach, the privacy considerations are the same: - if the destination is a dual-stack (or IPv6-only) IPv6 will be used in both cases; - if the destination is IPv4-only, the traffic will go through NAT44 (dual-stack) or NAT64 (IPv6-mostly) Would adding a text that privacy considerations are inherited from a dual-stack design? > Is there any interaction with site policies (dis)allowing temporary > addresses? Any interaction with randomized MAC addresses? It's all existing in any other IPv6 deployment, right? Nothing specific to IPv6-mostly. I didn't consider enumerating all IPv6 privacy implications, but maybe I should.. > On 05-Mar-24 01:27, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > Internet-Draft draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00.txt is now available. > > > > Title: IPv6-Mostly Networks: Deployment and Operations Considerations > > Author: Jen Linkova > > Name: draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00.txt > > Pages: 16 > > Dates: 2024-03-04 > > > > Abstract: > > > > This document discusses an deployment scenario called "an IPv6-Mostly > > network", when IPv6-only and IPv4-enabled endpoints coexist on the > > same network (network segment, VLAN, SSID etc). > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-link-v6ops-6mops/ > > > > There is also an HTML version available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00.html > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: > > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > I-D-Announce mailing list > > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > > > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops -- Cheers, Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00… Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-link-v6ops-6mops-00… Mark Smith